Art. 59 URG · Bundesgesetz vom 9. Oktober 1992 über das Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte (URG) (231.1)

B-5328/2024 (Art. 59 Abs. 1 URG)

Collective Tariff for Music Performances Upheld

This provision was cited as the legal basis for the lower instance approving the tariff.

HOR.2023.60 · ag (Art. 59 Abs. 3 URG)

Copyright Collective v. Defendant (Overdue Royalties)

States that finally approved tariffs are generally binding on the courts.

C/2736/2023 · ge (art. 59 al. 1 LDA)

Copyright Management Cooperative v. Service Company (Overdue Remuneration Fees)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for tariffs to be approved by the Federal Arbitration Commission if fair.

C/2736/2023 · ge (art. 59 al. 3 LDA)

Copyright Management Cooperative v. Service Company (Overdue Remuneration Fees)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the binding effect of tariffs on the judge.

C/2741/2023 · ge (art. 59 al. 3 LDA)

Collective Rights Management Organization v. Hospitality LLC (Unpaid Tariffs)

Basis that binds the judge to the approved Tariffs used to calculate the admitted claim.

ZKEIV.2023.1 · so (Art. 59 Abs. 3 URG)

Copyright Collection Agency v. Limited Liability Company (Reprography Fees)

This provision confirms that courts are bound by the officially approved tariffs used to calculate the claim.

C/2718/2023 · ge (art. 59 al. 3 LDA)

Copyright Collection Society v. Service Company (Failure to Disclose Usage Data)

Basis for the binding effect on the judge of the established tariffs (TC 8 and TC 9).

Z2 2023 15 · zg (Art. 59 Abs. 3 URG)

Collective Rights Management Organization v. Defendant (Copyright Remuneration for Internal Use)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the binding nature of approved tariffs for courts.

Z2 2022 68 · zg (Art. 59 Abs. 3 URG)

Copyright Collective Society v. Defendant: Fee Dispute and Cost Allocation

Cited in the reasoning section stating that tariffs approved by the Arbitration Commission are binding on the courts.

ZKEIV.2020.3 · so (Art. 59 Abs. 3 URG)

Collective Management Organization v. Business: Unpaid Copyright Fees and Interest

Cited in the reasoning section stating that approved tariffs are binding on courts.

CC 2018 108 · ju (art. 59 al. 3 LDA)

Copyright Collective v. Unsubstantiated Claims of Unequal Treatment

Mandates that judges are bound by the applicable common tariffs.

28.2019.EKA · vd (art. 59 al. 3 LDA)

Copyright Management Cooperative v. Business Owner: Unpaid Remuneration Fees

The court confirmed that the established tariffs bind the judge, justifying the assessment of the claimed amounts.

C/29226/2018 · ge (Art. 59 al. 1 LDA)

Collective Management Society v. Company (Copyright Royalties Dispute)

Cited as part of the relevant provisions governing the binding nature of the approved tariffs, even though the non-observance of the tariff procedure was the primary reason for rejection.

C/29273/2018 · ge (Art. 59 al. 1 LDA)

Management Society v. Company (Unpaid Copying Fees)

This provision establishes that the tariffs, once approved by the Federal Arbitration Commission, bind the judge, justifying the application of the tariffs in the judgment.

ZKEIV.2018.8 · so (Art. 59 Abs. 3 URG)

Copyright Collective v. Sole Proprietor for Unpaid Photocopy Fees

Cited in the reasoning to establish the binding nature of the tariffs, which underpins the granted claim.

Art. 59 Bundesgesetz vom 9. Oktober 1992 über das Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte (URG) - Tarifgenehmigung

Art. 59 URG · Tarifgenehmigung

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (36)