Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
220 ORCO CH

Art. 929 Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR)

OR; Vierte Abteilung: Handelsregister, Geschäftsfirmen und kaufmännische Buchführung; Dreissigster Titel: Das Handelsregister; E. Eintragung, Änderung und Löschung; I. Grundsätze
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (1,685 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 929 OR

Einträge im Handelsregister müssen wahr sein und dürfen weder zu Täuschungen Anlass geben noch einem öffentlichen Interesse zuwiderlaufen.

Die Eintragung ins Handelsregister beruht auf einer Anmeldung. Die einzutragenden Tatsachen sind zu belegen.

Eintragungen können auch aufgrund eines Urteils oder einer Verfügung eines Gerichts oder einer Verwaltungsbehörde oder von Amtes wegen erfolgen.

← Art. 928c OR Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR) Art. 930 OR →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)

C/3574/2024 · ge (Art. 929 al. 1 CO)
Commercial Registry Address Modification Judicial Review
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the requirement that entries in the commercial register must be truthful and not misleading.
2022.08.17.vv.2 · bl (Art. 929 Abs. 2 OR)
Foundation's Inquiry Misinterpreted as Application
Cited to establish that registrations in the commercial register require an application with supporting documents.
VB.2021.00392 · zh (Art. 929 Abs. 2 OR)
Commercial Register Deletion of Liquidator Upheld
The court found no violation of the principle of documentation as required by this article.
HC.2010.680 · vd (Art. 929 al. 1 CO)
Commercial Company Dissolution for Failure to Update Domicile
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the determination of appeal costs, although not directly used in the operative orders I, II, or III, it is referenced in the section detailing the basis for cost assessment preceding the dispositive.
VB.2010.00290 · zh (Art. 929 Abs. I OR)
Jurisdictional Dispute Over Commercial Register Appeals
The court determined that Art. 929 para. I OR did not provide a sufficient legal basis for the Federal Council to interfere with cantonal organizational autonomy regarding the appeal structure in commercial register matters.
HC.2010.346 · vd (Art. 929 al. 1 CO)
Commercial Register Dissolution Appeal: Failure to Maintain Domicile
This article is cited in the reasoning for the determination of appeal costs, which are then fixed in the dispositive.
HC.2010.199 · vd (Art. 929 al. 1 CO)
Appeal Against Company Dissolution for Lack of Domicile
This article is cited in the reasoning leading to the decision regarding the authority to set costs based on the federal tariff ordinance (OERC).
HC.2010.181 · vd (Art. 929 al. 1 CO)
Commercial Register Fee Dispute (Withdrawal and Reminder)
Cited in the introductory notes, it provides the basis for the Federal Council to issue regulations on commercial register fees, which led to the OERC used in the decision.
VB.2000.00048 · zh (Art. 929 OR)
Commercial Register Fees: Administrative, Not Tax, and Cost-Covering
Cited as the legal basis for trade register fees.
VPB 94-3392 (Art. 929 alinéa 2 CO)
Company Name Law Revision and Harmonization with EU Directives
Cited as the legal basis for requiring fees to cover management costs of commercial registry offices and publication costs, with a proposal for modification to ensure uniformity and electronic availability of data.
VPB 94-3393 (Art. 929 al. 2 OR)
Harmonization of Commercial Register Entries and Publications: Postponed for Further Study
Cited in the dispositive to be amended and clarified regarding fees covering administrative costs and publication expenses.
VB.2010.00372 · zh (Art. 929 Abs. I OR)
Challenge to CHF 51 Commercial Register Fee Based on Lack of Jurisdiction
This provision relates to the basis for the fee being challenged, although the primary reason for the order is based on competence.