Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
220 ORCO CH

Art. 67 Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR)

OR; Erste Abteilung: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; Erster Titel: Die Entstehung der Obligationen; Dritter Abschnitt: Die Entstehung aus ungerechtfertigter Bereicherung; D. Verjährung
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (1,685 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 67 OR

Der Bereicherungsanspruch verjährt mit Ablauf von drei Jahren, nachdem der Verletzte von seinem Anspruch Kenntnis erhalten hat, in jedem Fall aber mit Ablauf von zehn Jahren seit der Entstehung des Anspruchs.

Besteht die Bereicherung in einer Forderung an den Verletzten, so kann dieser die Erfüllung auch dann verweigern, wenn der Bereicherungsanspruch verjährt ist.

← Art. 66 OR Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR) Art. 68 OR →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (167)

VVGE.1978.80.Nr.27 · ow (Art. 67 OR)
Public Law Claims for Undue Payments: Five-Year Statute of Limitations Applies
The defendant's plea of prescription was based on this article.
RBOG.1995.Nr.6 · tg (Art. 67 Abs. 1 OR)
Tenant Rent Overpayment Recovery and Knowledge of Invalidity
It governs the prescription period applicable to the claim for unjust enrichment.
A/2733/2024 · ge (art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Heirs v. Pension Fund Regarding Voided Early Withdrawal Repayment After Retroactive Disability Recognition
Used in the reasoning (6.3) to confirm that the plaintiffs acted within the prescription periods for unjust enrichment.
HG210127 · zh (Art. 67 OR)
Real Estate Development Payment Dispute and Fee Calculation
Cited regarding the statutory limitation period (Verjährungsfrist) for unjust enrichment claims.
C/8108/2021 · ge (Art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Lessee and Landlord Rent Adjustment Appeal Regarding Basement Apartment Defects and Void Initial Rent
Cited to establish the prescription period for claiming restitution of the overpaid rent.
A/2412/2023 · ge (art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Landlord Rent Overcharge Reimbursement Limitation
This article (by analogy) governed the prescription period applied to reduce the reimbursed overpaid rent amount.
KK.2021.00028 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 OR)
Claimant v. Insurer: Outstanding Sickness Benefits Dispute
Cited in the reasoning regarding the rejection of the insurer's claim for unjust enrichment (unjustified payment recall claim), but not explicitly mentioned in the final orders (dispositive).
C/8828/2022 · ge (art. 67 CO)
Tenants' Appeal Regarding Rent Guarantee Reduction and Statute of Limitations on Interest Claim
The court confirmed the decision based on the prescriptive period under this article for claims arising from unjust enrichment (restitution of undue rent payments).
A/661/2022 · ge (Art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Company v. Pension Foundation: Contribution Reimbursement and Collective Agreement Scope
Cited to reject the prescription defense raised by the defendant regarding the claim for undue contributions.
C1 21 201 · vs (art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Appeal Regarding Reimbursement of Ancillary Rental Costs Under Tenancy Law
The court examined the prescription period for the claim for unjust enrichment, which was the basis for the award.
HC.2023.343 · vd (Art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Landlord Ordered to Reimburse Overpaid Rent; Statute of Limitations Did Not Apply Due to Tenant's Lack of Knowledge
Cited in the reasoning related to the prescription of the claim for unjust enrichment, which was central to the appeal regarding the tenant's claim.
C/13346/2020 · ge (art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Landlord-Tenant Dispute Over Rent Increase Notice and Service Charge Calculation Basis
Cited in relation to the prescription period for the unjust enrichment claim before the 2020 reform.
KK.2020.00049 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 OR)
Insurer's Reimbursement Claim Dismissed Against Overlapping Insured Counterclaim for Unpaid Benefits
Cited to confirm that the claim for unjust enrichment was not time-barred.
102 2022 123 · fr (Art. 67 Abs. 1 OR)
Tenant v. Landlords: Rent Setting and Ancillary Cost Refund
Applied to determine that the claim for reimbursement of unjustly paid supplementary charges was not time-barred.
KK.2021.00007 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 OR)
Insurer Recovers Fraudulently Obtained Disability Benefits
Although discussed extensively regarding prescription, it was superseded by the new law, but the claim's existence is generally framed by enrichment law principles.