Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
220 ORCO CH

Art. 64 Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR)

OR; Erste Abteilung: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; Erster Titel: Die Entstehung der Obligationen; Dritter Abschnitt: Die Entstehung aus ungerechtfertigter Bereicherung; B. Umfang der Rückerstattung; I. Pflicht des Bereicherten
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (1,685 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 64 OR

Die Rückerstattung kann insoweit nicht gefordert werden, als der Empfänger nachweisbar zur Zeit der Rückforderung nicht mehr bereichert ist, es sei denn, dass er sich der Bereicherung entäusserte und hierbei nicht in gutem Glauben war oder doch mit der Rückerstattung rechnen musste.

← Art. 63 OR Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR) Art. 65 OR →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (110)

A/3066/2014 · ge (art. 64 CO)
Public Employee Dismissal and Salary Reimbursement Dispute
Used to support the finding that the appellant was no longer enriched and thus not obligated to restitute the wages received.
ZZ.1988.6 · so (Art. 64 OR)
Unjust Enrichment Following Bank's Mistaken Disbursement Under Forged Agreement
Applied to limit the amount of restitution due to the defendant's good faith regarding the portion of the funds given to the third party.
VB.2023.00425 · zh (Art. 64 OR)
Recovery of Overpaid Social Assistance Benefits Pending Appeal
Cited in relation to the overall legal framework for reimbursement, even if not explicitly detailed in the final orders, it is listed in the cited legal norms section related to the merits.
VB.2023.00613 · zh (Art. 64 OR)
Restitution of Salary Paid to Former Teacher; Good Faith Requirement
Cited in the reasoning as the analogous private law standard for restitution of unjustified enrichment, specifically concerning the defense of lack of good faith.
12.2024.31 · ti (Art. 64 CO)
Commercial Lease Dispute: Rent Arrears, Renewal Validity, and Improper Occupation Indemnity
Cited in the reasoning section (para 11.2) regarding the tacit acceptance of an offer, but not explicitly mentioned in the final operative orders (dispositive).
HG210127 · zh (Art. 64 OR)
Real Estate Development Payment Dispute and Fee Calculation
Cited in the context of the defendant's argument that they are no longer enriched (relevant to unjust enrichment defense).
C/23894/2020 · ge (art. 64 CO)
Reimbursement for Unauthorized Credit Card Charges Related to Prostitution Services
The appellant's argument regarding loss of enrichment was implicitly rejected by confirming the underlying obligation to restitute under Art. 62 CO.
ZOR.2023.38 · ag (Art. 64 OR)
Buyer's Unjust Enrichment Claim Limited by Rental Profits
This provision specifies conditions under which claims can be made for unjust enrichment.
S2 22 77 · vs (Art. 64 OR)
Insured's Liability for Accident Insurance Overpayment Following Brawl Exclusion and Third-Party Payment
Cited regarding the condition for claiming back payment when the recipient is no longer enriched.
VB.2023.00419 · zh (Art. 64 OR)
Social Welfare Office v. Recipient of Double Grant
Cited as a legal provision that is analogously applicable in public law for the recovery of undue payments.
S 2023 10 · zg (Art. 64 Abs. 1 OR)
Qualified Disloyal Business Management: Damages, Jurisdiction, and Procedural Costs Allocation
Cited in the reasoning but not explicitly used in a final dispositive order, therefore excluded.
KK.2020.00049 · zh (Art. 64 OR)
Insurer's Reimbursement Claim Dismissed Against Overlapping Insured Counterclaim for Unpaid Benefits
Cited as the legal basis defining the scope of restitution concerning whether the recipient is still enriched or acted in good faith.
STBER.2021.50 · so (Art. 64 OR)
Appeal Against Sexual Coercion Conviction Upheld with Delay Violation Noted
Cited in the final finding, likely relating to civil damages or compensation, though not explicitly detailed in the operative part regarding the final compensation amount.
KK.2021.00007 · zh (Art. 64 OR)
Insurer Recovers Fraudulently Obtained Disability Benefits
Cited regarding the defendant's failure to prove he was no longer enriched at the time of the claim for restitution.
C1 20 147 · vs (Art. 64 CO)
Appeal Concerning Restitution for Unjust Enrichment and Prescriptive Period
The court rejected the appellant's argument for exemption from restitution based on this article.