Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
220 ORCO CH

Art. 579 Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR)

OR; Dritte Abteilung: Die Handelsgesellschaften und die Genossenschaft; Vierundzwanzigster Titel: Die Kollektivgesellschaft; Vierter Abschnitt: Auflösung und Ausscheiden; C. Ausscheiden von Gesellschaftern; IV. Bei zwei Gesellschaftern
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (1,685 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 579 OR

Sind nur zwei Gesellschafter vorhanden, so kann derjenige, der keine Veranlassung zur Auflösung gegeben hatte, unter den gleichen Voraussetzungen das Geschäft fortsetzen und dem andern Gesellschafter seinen Anteil am Gesellschaftsvermögen ausrichten.

Das gleiche kann das Gericht verfügen, wenn die Auflösung wegen eines vorwiegend in der Person des einen Gesellschafters liegenden wichtigen Grundes gefordert wird.

← Art. 578 OR Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR) Art. 580 OR →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (9)

C/3369/2014 · ge (Art. 579 al. 1 CO)
Corporate Succession and Improper Appeal in Intervention
Cited to explain the legal consequence of one partner continuing the business after dissolution, relevant to the continuity of liability.
12.2012.147 · ti (art. 579 cpv. 1 CO)
Former Partner Liquidation Dispute and Continuation of Business
This article was the main ground used to reject the appeal against the decision not to declare the initial action inadmissible, confirming that the sole shareholder could continue the business individually.
AP.2011.93 · vd (Art. 579 CO)
Partnership Continuation and Property Transfer Dispute
This article on the continuation of business by the non-culpable associate was applied to allow the defendant (the respondent) to continue the partnership's business.
ML.2010.31 · vd (Art. 579 CO)
Debt Enforcement Appeal Rejection: Successor Liability for Ceded Debt
Mentioned in the reasoning to justify the continuation of the business and the debtor's liability, but it is not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders (I-IV).
12.2008.96 · ti (art. 579 CO)
Partnership Dissolution and Asset Distribution Dispute
This provision establishes the rule applied to the continuation of the company's activity by the remaining partner after the dissolution of the two-person partnership, which is the core legal situation addressed in the partial acceptance of the appeal.
PS.2005.0299 · vd (Art. 579 CO)
Repayment of Short-Time Work Benefits by Successor Sole Proprietorship
Although cited in the reasoning to establish the continuing debtor, this article was not explicitly cited in the final orders (I, II, III) to justify the rejection of the appeal, thus it is excluded based on the rules.
ZF 2002 51 · gr (Art. 579 OR)
Appellate Court Upholds Dismissal of Cohabitation Dissolution Claims Related to Partnership Liquidation
Mentioned in the reasoning when discussing the possibility of asset transfer (assumed to be part of the rejected contractual agreement for the Fr. 20'000 claim).
12.2000.153 · ti (art. 579 cpv. 1 CO)
Partner Goodwill Refund Dispute
This article, concerning the rights of the remaining partner continuing the business, is cited in the reasoning leading to the final orders, although the core decision relies on its implications regarding the division of social assets.
12.2012.147 · ti (art. 579 cpv. 1 CO)
Physiotherapist Partnership Dissolution and Direct Monetary Claim Admissibility
This article was central to the decision regarding the continuation of the enterprise by one partner after the dissolution of the two-partner collective company, as confirmed in order 3.