220
ORCO
CH
CH
Art. 56 Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR)
OR; Erste Abteilung: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; Erster Titel: Die Entstehung der Obligationen; Zweiter Abschnitt: Die Entstehung durch unerlaubte Handlungen; D. Haftung für Tiere; I. Ersatzpflicht
Art. 56 OR
Für den von einem Tier angerichteten Schaden haftet, wer dasselbe hält, wenn er nicht nachweist, dass er alle nach den Umständen gebotene Sorgfalt in der Verwahrung und Beaufsichtigung angewendet habe, oder dass der Schaden auch bei Anwendung dieser Sorgfalt eingetreten wäre.
Vorbehalten bleibt ihm der Rückgriff, wenn das Tier von einem andern oder durch das Tier eines andern gereizt worden ist.
...
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (24)
P/26717/2022 · ge (Art. 56 al. 1 CO)
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision on Negligent Bodily Injury from Dog Bite
Cited concerning the liability of the dog keeper for damage caused by the animal, relevant to the duty of care.
C1 21 118 · vs (Art. 56 CO)
Cow Intrusion and Damages Assessment Appeal
The court confirmed the lower court's finding that the defendant was responsible as the animal owner under this article, although the appeal ultimately failed on damages.
C/9235/2019 · ge (Art. 56 CO)
Landlord v. Tenant: Roof Drainage Maintenance and Exceptional Weather
Cited in the reasoning (point 3.1) regarding tenant liability for animals for whom they are responsible.
BK 2022 241 · be (Art. 56 OR)
Appellate Review of Negligent Bodily Harm Investigation Non-Commencement Due to Insufficient Fact-Finding
Cited by analogy for assessing the required standard of care in companion animal cases.
HC.2021.58 · vd (Art. 56 CO)
Stallion Injury Liability in Boarding Contract Dispute
Cited in the context of the owner's liability for animal damage, which was considered in the analysis of the defendant's liability, although ultimately excluded.
VG.2020.00086 · gl (Art. 56 OR)
Dog Owner Ban Upheld, Modified on Supervised Care; Legal Aid Granted, Costs Deferred
Relates to the liability of animal owners for damages caused by their animals.
SK 2019 383 · be (Art. 47 und 56 OR)
Negligent Infliction of Bodily Harm by Unrestrained Dangerous Dog
Cited in the dispositive (IV) as the basis for ruling on the civil claims (claim for damages under Art. 56 OR and claim for solace money/genugtuung under Art. 47 OR).
VB.2017.00316 · zh (Art. 56 Abs. I OR)
Woman Liable for Seized Animal Costs
Used to determine the definition of 'keeper' in the context of liability.
BO.2016.8 · sg (Art. 56 OR)
Dog Owner Liability for Pedestrian Injury from Lunging Animal
The court found that all liability prerequisites under this article were met, making the defendant liable for the damage caused.
BO.2016.8 · sg (Art. 56 OR)
Dog Attack Causation and Owner Liability for Aggressive Animal
The court found all liability prerequisites under this article fulfilled, making the defendant fundamentally liable for the resulting damage.
16.2014.12 · ti (Art. 56 cpv. 1 CO)
Animal Keeper Liability for Pet Injury
This article establishes the strict liability of the animal keeper, which was the legal basis for upholding the initial judgment finding liability.
2015.05.05.zr.4 · bl (Art. 56 Abs. 1 OR)
Horse Owner Not Liable for Fatal Collision Despite Defective Fencing
This provision establishes the liability of an animal keeper for damages caused by the animal, unless the keeper proves they exercised due care or that the damage would have occurred regardless.
RVJ 2014 p 200 204 · vs (art. 56 al. 1 CO)
Hiker Injury Negligence Appeal vs. Alp Manager
Cited to establish the appellant's guarantor position as an animal keeper, relevant to the alleged criminal omission.
BZ.2005.118 · sg (Art. 56 Abs. 1 OR)
Dog Owner Liability and Comparative Fault in Animal Bite Case
The court affirmed the defendant's liability in principle based on the criteria of this article regarding animal keeper liability.
BZ.2005.118 · sg (Art. 56 Abs. 1 OR)
Dog Owner Liability and Contributory Negligence in Dog Bite Case
The court affirmed the defendant's liability as the animal keeper based on this provision, as the exemption proof failed.