220
ORCO
CH
CH
Art. 340c Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR)
OR; Zweite Abteilung: Die einzelnen Vertragsverhältnisse; Zehnter Titel: Der Arbeitsvertrag; Erster Abschnitt: Der Einzelarbeitsvertrag; G. Beendigung des Arbeitsverhältnisses; VII. Konkurrenzverbot; 4. Wegfall
Art. 340c OR
Das Konkurrenzverbot fällt dahin, wenn der Arbeitgeber nachweisbar kein erhebliches Interesse mehr hat, es aufrecht zu erhalten.
Das Verbot fällt ferner dahin, wenn der Arbeitgeber das Arbeitsverhältnis kündigt, ohne dass ihm der Arbeitnehmer dazu begründeten Anlass gegeben hat, oder wenn es dieser aus einem begründeten, vom Arbeitgeber zu verantwortenden Anlass auflöst.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (63)
LA240001 · zh (Art. 340c Abs. 1 OR)
Employee's Appeal Dismissed for Non-Solicitation Clause Violation
The court affirmed that the non-solicitation clause did not lose its effectiveness because the employer retained a significant interest in upholding it.
LA220013 · zh (Art. 340c Abs. 2 OR)
Employment Agency v. Former Employee: Non-Compete Clause Penalty Reduced
Used to determine whether the non-competition clause is invalid due to a justified termination by the employee.
LA220013 · zh (Art. 340c OR)
Employment Agency v. Former Employee: Non-Compete Clause Penalty Reduced
Defines the circumstances under which a non-competition clause becomes void.
C/19132/2020 · ge (Art. 340c al. 2 CO)
Appellant v. Former Employee (Non-Compete Penalty)
The court confirmed the lower court's decision, which found that the non-compete clause ceased to be effective because the employment contract was terminated by the employer without just cause.
ZVE.2023.16 · ag (Art. 340c Abs. 2 OR)
Employee's Non-Compete Clause Upheld Despite Claims of Misconduct
The court used this article to determine if the non-competition clause had lapsed due to a justified reason for the employee's termination.
C1 20 263 · vs (art. 340c al. 2 CO)
Employee Upheld Against Non-Compete Penalty Due to Invalid Clause and Justified Resignation
The court confirmed the lower court's decision that the non-compete clause ceased to be effective because the reason for termination of employment was imputable to the employer.
C/524/2018 · ge (art. 340c al. 2 CO)
Employee v. Employer: Non-Compete Validity, Bonus Entitlement, and Damages Following Resignation
Used to determine that the non-compete clause became void because the employee resigned for justified reasons attributable to the employer.
12.2021.72 · ti (art. 340c CO)
Employee Challenge to Non-Compete Penalty Enforcement Upheld
This article (concerning the cessation of the non-compete clause) was central to the appeal's subject matter, although the court ultimately upheld the lower court's finding that the clause was not voided under this provision.
C/8423/2018 · ge (art. 340c al. 2 CO)
Employee Overtime Compensation and MBA Cost Reimbursement Appeal
Cited by analogy in the reasoning concerning the potential lapse of training cost reimbursement clauses if the employee resigns without a justified reason.
15.2020 · vd (art. 340c al. 2 CO)
Claimants v. Former Employee (Non-Compete and Shareholder Claims)
The court concluded that the non-compete clause did not apply because the personal nature of the trustee's relationship with clients assimilated the situation to that of a liberal profession, overriding the clause.
AN170001 · zh (Art. 340c Abs. 2 OR)
Employment Contract Dispute: Non-Compete Indemnity and Guaranteed Bonus
Used to establish that the non-competition agreement lapsed because the employer terminated without just cause, which formed the basis for dismissing the claim for compensation.
ML.2018.215 · vd (Art. 340c al. 2 CO)
Employee v. Employer regarding Non-Competition Clause Compensation and Termination Validity
This article was the substantive ground for admitting the appeal because it caused the non-competition clause to cease effect, leading to the maintenance of the opposition.
LF180017 · zh (Art. 340c Abs. 2 OR)
Employer Fails to Enforce Non-Compete Agreement Due to Insufficient Justification for Termination
This provision governs the lapse of a non-compete clause when the employer terminates the employment relationship without a justified cause. The court used it to determine whether the non-compete clause remained valid.
LA170026 · zh (Art. 340c Abs. 2 OR)
Commission Dispute Versus Non-Compete Penalty Set-Off
The appeal was dismissed because the court found that the employer did not have a justified reason (begründeter Anlass) for termination, leading to the lapse of the post-contractual non-compete clause.
LA160029 · zh (Art. 340c Abs. 1 OR)
Personnel Consulting Firm v. Former Senior Consultant (Non-Compete Clause Validity)
The court affirmed the first instance's decision to reject the claim based on the conclusion that the plaintiff did not prove a continuing significant interest in upholding the non-compete clause.