220
ORCO
CH
CH
Art. 34 Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR)
OR; Erste Abteilung: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; Erster Titel: Die Entstehung der Obligationen; Erster Abschnitt: Die Entstehung durch Vertrag; G. Stellvertretung; I. Mit Ermächtigung; 2. Auf Grund von Rechtsgeschäft; a. Beschränkung und Widerruf
Art. 34 OR
Eine durch Rechtsgeschäft erteilte Ermächtigung kann vom Vollmachtgeber jederzeit beschränkt oder widerrufen werden, unbeschadet der Rechte, die sich aus einem unter den Beteiligten bestehenden anderen Rechtsverhältnis, wie Einzelarbeitsvertrag, Gesellschaftsvertrag, Auftrag, ergeben können.
Ein vom Vollmachtgeber zum voraus erklärter Verzicht auf dieses Recht ist ungültig.
Hat der Vertretene die Vollmacht ausdrücklich oder tatsächlich kundgegeben, so kann er deren gänzlichen oder teilweisen Widerruf gutgläubigen Dritten nur dann entgegensetzen, wenn er ihnen auch diesen Widerruf mitgeteilt hat.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (30)
A-7754/2024 (Art. 34 al. 2 de la loi sur le CO2)
Geothermal Project Funding Denial Upheld Due to Indirect Use and Heat Pump Requirement
This article is the substantive legal basis for granting subsidies for the direct use of geothermal energy, and the court's decision on whether the project qualifies under this article forms the core of the dispute and the grounds for rejecting the appeal.
605 2021 218 · fr (art. 34 al. 1 CO)
Employment Service v. Manager Regarding Retroactive Short-Time Work Compensation Denial
This article was implicitly referenced in the discussion about the required content of the appeal memorandum to the Federal Tribunal, though not explicitly numbered in the dispositive orders.
C/7031/2018 · ge (Art. 34 al. 3 CO)
Owner Liable for Supplier Invoices Based on Consultant's Apparent Authority
Cited regarding the protection of the third party in case of revocation of powers.
730.20.110.283 · bl (Art. 34 Abs. 3 OR)
Social Service Office Policy Changes Approved by Tacit Consent
Cited as a provision that can lead to effects for third parties in case of lack of representation authority, potentially through good faith protection.
730.20.110.283 · bl (Art. 34 Abs. 3 OR)
Social Service Office Policy Changes Approved by Tacit Consent
Cited concerning the burden of proof for representation authority.
KGVS C1 19 240 · vs (Art. 34 Abs. 1 OR)
Plaintiff v. Defendant: Verbal Construction Contract Dispute
Cited in the reasoning concerning the unilateral and informal nature of granting authorization.
C/14293/2018 · ge (art. 34 CO)
Mandate Revocation in Swiss Litigation Representation
Cited regarding the right of the represented party to restrict or revoke powers granted by a legal act, although its waiver is void.
C/21112/2011 · ge (Art. 34 al. 3 CO)
Construction Payment Dispute and Contract Termination Appeal
Cited alongside other provisions regarding the good faith reliance of a third party on communicated powers of representation.
2018.08.09.sv.2 · bl (Art. 34 Abs. 3 OR)
Health Insurer v. Insured: Implicit Approval of Insurance Contract
Addresses the potential impact of good faith protection when representation authority is lacking.
C/6670/2013 · ge (art. 34 al. 1 CO)
Appellant v. Bank for Agent's Fraudulent Transfers
Cited in the reasoning to support the principle that the client is responsible for monitoring the representative and restricting their powers if necessary.
C/12851/2015 · ge (art. 34 al. 3 CO)
Sole Proprietorship vs. LLC Placement Fee Standing
Cited generally in the context of representation.
STBER.2017.11 · so (Art. 34 OR)
Appellate Court Upholds Dismissal of Procedural Challenge, Acquits on One Embezzlement Count, Convicts on Another
Cited in the preamble to the operative part, relating to damages claims.
102 2016 206 · fr (art. 34 al. 3 CO)
Tenants' Rent Reduction Upheld for Persistent Defects and Imputed Knowledge
Cited in the reasoning to justify why defects announced to E.________ are opposable to the appellants, justifying the final awards on rent reduction.
EL.2015.35 · sg (Art. 34 Abs. 3 OR)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimeliness Due to Service Date Interpretation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the legal assumption of good faith concerning representation authority, which supported the decision on proper notification.
EL.2015.35 · sg (Art. 34 Abs. 3 OR)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Following Post Office Box Notification
Cited in the reasoning to support the assumption of a valid mandate when the decision was issued, although not directly in the final orders, it underpins the main ground for dismissal.