220
ORCO
CH
CH
Art. 30 Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR)
OR; Erste Abteilung: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; Erster Titel: Die Entstehung der Obligationen; Erster Abschnitt: Die Entstehung durch Vertrag; F. Mängel des Vertragsabschlusses; III. Furchterregung; 2. Gegründete Furcht
Art. 30 OR
Die Furcht ist für denjenigen eine gegründete, der nach den Umständen annehmen muss, dass er oder eine ihm nahe verbundene Person an Leib und Leben, Ehre oder Vermögen mit einer nahen und erheblichen Gefahr bedroht sei.
Die Furcht vor der Geltendmachung eines Rechtes wird nur dann berücksichtigt, wenn die Notlage des Bedrohten benutzt worden ist, um ihm die Einräumung übermässiger Vorteile abzunötigen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (35)
ZB.2024.23 · bs (Art. 30 OR)
Tenant Eviction Reversed Due to Revoked Agent Mandates
Cited in the reasoning regarding the required element of 'founded fear' for invalidity due to duress.
ZOR.2023.37 · ag (Art. 30 Abs. 2 OR)
Divorce Judgment Revision Denied Due to Untimely Filing and Lack of Proof
Addresses the specific case of fear related to the assertion of a right, requiring exploitation of a precarious situation.
ZSU.2023.167 · ag (Art. 30 Abs. 2 OR)
Child Support and Amendment Agreement Validity in Debt Enforcement
Cited to explain when fear of asserting a right is considered a defect of consent, specifically when an emergency situation is exploited to extort excessive advantages.
C-4387/2019 (Art. 30 OR)
Employer's Appeal Against Pension Contribution Order Dismissed Due to Payment Defaults
Defines when a threat is considered founded and therefore grounds for invalidating a contract.
TR 17 481 · vs (art. 30 CO)
Employee v. Employer: Unpaid Wages Following Voidable Termination Due to Exploitation of Distress
Mentioned as part of the legal framework concerning vitiated consent (fear), although the primary ground used for the ruling was Art. 21 CO (lésion).
RT170063 · zh (Art. 30 Abs. 2 OR)
*D.J. & Partners Inc. v. J.M. Services S.A.*
Cited in relation to the argument of unlawful coercion and obtaining excessive advantages through intimidation.
C/3120/2011 · ge (art. 30 al. 1 CO)
Settlement Validity Challenge Based on Duress Over VAT Form Withholding Upheld
Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for assessing whether the alleged threat to C______ constituted a founded fear, which was the core substantive issue.
C/3120/2011 · ge (art. 30 al. 2 CO)
Settlement Validity Challenge Based on Duress Over VAT Form Withholding Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to address the appellant's alternative argument regarding excessive advantages extorted by invoking a right.
2016.12.07.vv.1 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 30 OR)
Employee's Agreed Salary Reduction Upheld; Retroactive Raise Denied
Cited in the reasoning as the provisions governing vitiated consent (duress/threat) in contract law, which the appellant invoked but which the court rejected.
ARMC.2016.66 · ne (Art. 30 CO)
Debt Acknowledgment Duress Challenge Upheld
This provision defines the elements of founded fear, which was central to the debtor's defense against the claim.
2016.10.27.sv.2 · bl (Art. 30 Abs. 2 OR)
Settlement Invalid Due to Coerced Consent and Unjust Enrichment
The court used this provision to determine that the settlement agreement was not binding due to a defect in consent, as the insurer unfairly exploited the insured's distress by threatening legal action.
ZKBER.2016.81 · so (Art. 30 Abs. 1 OR)
Appeal of Divorce Judgment Settled Under Duress Dismissed as Inadmissible Revision
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for the threatened evil to constitute an imminent and significant danger.
ZKBER.2016.81 · so (Art. 30 Abs. 2 OR)
Appeal of Divorce Judgment Settled Under Duress Dismissed as Inadmissible Revision
Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions under which a threat of a lawful act is considered.
ML.2016.49 · vd (Art. 30 CO)
Debt Enforcement Challenge Based on Duress Claim
This provision regarding well-founded fear was used to reject the debtor's argument that the acknowledgments of debt were signed under duress.
C/9953/2013 · ge (Art. 30 CO)
Debt Assumption Liability Upheld Despite Claim of Vitiated Consent
Used in the reasoning to reject the claim that the debt assumption was made under duress (founded fear).