220
ORCO
CH
Art. 275 Bundesgesetz vom 30. März 1911 betreffend die Ergänzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (OR)
OR; Zweite Abteilung: Die einzelnen Vertragsverhältnisse; Achter Titelbis: Die Pacht; A. Begriff und Geltungsbereich; I. Begriff
Art. 275 OR
Durch den Pachtvertrag verpflichten sich der Verpächter, dem Pächter eine nutzbare Sache oder ein nutzbares Recht zum Gebrauch und zum Bezug der Früchte oder Erträgnisse zu überlassen, und der Pächter, dafür einen Pachtzins zu leisten.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (17)
C/21098/2023 · ge (art. 275 CO)
Landlord's Valid Lease Transfer Extinguishes Sub-Lessee's Right to Occupy
Cited in the context of defining a lease for productive property, although its main relevance appears in contrast to sub-lease considerations.
C/15265/2023 · ge (art. 275 CO)
Appellant v. Appellee (Restaurant Operation Dispute)
The court found that the agreement between the parties was likely a lease for non-agricultural real estate (bail à ferme), which is governed by this article.
C/22631/2017 · ge (art. 275 CO)
Lessor Lockout Constitutes Breach Excusing Tenant Rent Payments Post-Exclusion
Cited in the reasoning to define the nature of the contract as a farming lease ('bail à ferme'). While used extensively in the reasoning, it is not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders (which only concern costs and the modification of previous orders).
C/9514/2015 · ge (Art. 275 ss CO)
Sublessor vs. Sublessee: Contractual Penalty Dispute Over Restaurant Lease Termination
Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis classifying the contract as a non-agricultural lease/farm lease (bail à ferme), although not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
C/10082/2015 · ge (art. 275 à 304 CO)
Managers' Liability for Rent and Stock Repurchase under Management Contract
Cited in the reasoning as the scope of the non-agricultural lease contract, justifying the material competence of the Rent and Lease Chamber.
C/25178/2013 · ge (Art. 275 CO)
Lessee's Appeal of Lease Termination for Unpaid Rent Despite Claimed Set-Off
This provision defining a farm lease (bail à ferme) is cited in the legal reasoning concerning the applicable law for the lease.
C/8105/2013 · ge (Art. 275 CO)
Unauthorized Sublease Justifies Extraordinary Farm Lease Termination and Eviction
Cited in the reasoning to qualify the contract as a lease agreement (bail à ferme).
C/22544/2011 · ge (art. 275 CO)
Taxi Driver Lease-Farming Contract Simulation and Regulatory Circumvention
Cited in the reasoning to define the legal nature of the lease-farming contract (bail à ferme).
HG100117 · zh (Art. 275 ff. OR)
Real Estate Management Mandate Dispute and Expense Liability
Cited in the reasoning concerning the qualification of the element related to the provision of premises and infrastructure as a lease/pacht.
C/13223/2009 · ge (Art. 275 CO)
Appeal Regarding Termination of Farm Lease for Insufficient Revenue and Bad Faith Eviction Claim
Cited as the defining article for the farm lease contract, which determined the applicable law for the dispute.
C/3128/2007 · ge (art. 275 et ss CO)
Employee Wage Claim Against Restaurant Owner and Manager Under Leasehold Agreement
The court noted that the relationship between the parties was governed by a management contract (gérance libre), which falls under the scope of lease-farming/management contracts (bail à ferme).
CC.2002.11 · ne (Art. 275 CO)
Lease Termination and Equipment Valuation Dispute
Cited in the reasoning to define the nature of the lease as a lease of agricultural property (bail à ferme).
11 02 59 · lu (Art. 275 Abs. 1 OR)
Lease vs. Tenancy with Operational Rights in Restaurant Transfer
This article defining the lease/pacht relationship was discussed extensively as the main point of contention, but the court concluded that the facts did not meet the criteria for a lease (Pachtvertrag).
12.2002.57 · ti (art. 275 CO)
Agricultural Tenancy Renewal Dispute and Notice Validity
Cited to define the agricultural lease contract, although this is part of the reasoning, not directly the final order grounds.
C/27924/1996 · ge (art. 275 e CO)
Landlord v. Guarantor: Validity of Third-Party Letter of Intent as Residential Lease Guarantee
This article was cited as the basis for cantonal power to issue supplementary provisions regarding security deposits, although the court determined it did not apply directly to third-party guarantees like a suretyship or porte-fort.