210
ZGBCC
CH
CH
Art. 884 Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB)
ZGB; Zweite Abteilung: Die beschränkten dinglichen Rechte; Dreiundzwanzigster Titel: Das Fahrnispfand; Erster Abschnitt: Faustpfand und Retentionsrecht; A. Faustpfand; I. Bestellung; 1. Besitz des Gläubigers
Art. 884 ZGB
Fahrnis kann, wo das Gesetz keine Ausnahme macht, nur dadurch verpfändet werden, dass dem Pfandgläubiger der Besitz an der Pfandsache übertragen wird.
Der gutgläubige Empfänger der Pfandsache erhält das Pfandrecht, soweit nicht Dritten Rechte aus früherem Besitze zustehen, auch dann, wenn der Verpfänder nicht befugt war, über die Sache zu verfügen.
Das Pfandrecht ist nicht begründet, solange der Verpfänder die ausschliessliche Gewalt über die Sache behält.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (19)
ZK1 2019 7 · sz (Art. 884 i.V.m. Art. 901 ZGB)
Bearer Mortgage Bonds Security Transfer Dispute
Cited to support the claim that the creditor is only protected insofar as the securities were pledged with the consent of the owner (which was not the case for the full value).
P/7512/2016 · ge (Art. 884 CC)
Bearer Share Certificate Dispute and Attribution Ruling
Used in the reasoning supporting the decision to attribute the share certificate to C____ as the best-legitimized party among the possessors.
VD.2018.100 · bs (Art. 884 Abs. 3 ZGB)
Social Assistance Recipient Appeal Regarding Self-Employment Termination Deadline
Cited to exclude the existence of a pledge/pawn right based on the appellant's possession of the goods (Erw. 3.5.3).
HC.2015.1000 · vd (art. 884 CC)
Panamanian Company v. Bank Pledge Validity Appeal
Cited in the reasoning concerning the permissibility of a pledge on claims and other alienable rights, supporting the existence of the pledge.
14.2015.7 · ti (art. 884 cpv. 1 CC)
Third-Party Claim to Seized Motorboat Dismissed for Failure to Prove Ownership and Possession
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the requirements for establishing a possessory pledge.
C/14118/2012 · ge (art. 884 CC)
Bank v. Borrower (Lombard Loan Deficit)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the creation of a pledge on movable property (used in context of Lombard loan).
C/14769/2010 · ge (art. 884 CC)
Businessman v. Bank: Forced Securities Liquidation Following Margin Call
Cited in the legal framework discussion regarding the pledge of movable property.
HE110013 · zh (Art. 884 ZGB)
Bank Obligation to Release Funds vs. Withholding for Overseas Litigation Claims
The court examined differing scholarly opinions regarding the possibility of securing future claims by way of pledge under this article.
44.2011.PBH · vd (Art. 884 CC)
Bank v. Debtor: Real Estate Security Enforcement and Debt Liberation Dispute
Cited in the reasoning to point out that security Z was a movable pledge requiring a different enforcement procedure.
5A_315/2009 (Art. 884 al. 3 CC)
Pledge validity under Art. 884(3) CC: joint possession of pledged machinery in bankruptcy collocation
Substantive basis for rejecting the appeal; the court upheld the pledge's validity because the pledgor lost exclusive control over the pledged goods.
C/30598/2006 · ge (art. 884 al. 3 CC)
Creditor's Pledge Validity Over Movable Property and Transfer of Possession
The decision addresses the validity of the pledge based on this article, which concerns the requirement for loss of effective control over the pledged item.
BZ.2003.8.BZ.2003.9 · sg (Art. 884 ff. ZGB)
Claimant v. Depositary Company and Former Executive Regarding Safe Contents
The court rejected the claim regarding a pledge right (Pfandrecht) as alleged by D under these provisions.
BZ.2003.8.BZ.2003.9 · sg (Art. 884 ff. ZGB)
Claimant v. Storage Company and Officer Regarding Contents Sale and Pledge Rights
Cited regarding the assessment of the alleged pawn right claimed by D, which the court rejected in its final orders concerning the return of items.
C/2444/2001 · ge (art. 884 al. 2 CC)
Diamond Owner vs. Auction House: Validity of Pledge and Retention Rights
Applied to establish that B______ SA validly acquired a right of pledge (nantissement) despite I______ potentially lacking the power to dispose.
C/2444/2001 · ge (art. 884 al. 3 CC)
Diamond Owner vs. Auction House: Validity of Pledge and Retention Rights
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement of possession for a pledge, which leads to the conclusion that the pledge must be recognized if possession was transferred in good faith.