Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
210 ZGBCC CH

Art. 778 Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB)

ZGB; Zweite Abteilung: Die beschränkten dinglichen Rechte; Einundzwanzigster Titel: Die Dienstbarkeiten und Grundlasten; Zweiter Abschnitt: Nutzniessung und andere Dienstbarkeiten; B. Wohnrecht; III. Lasten
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (1,277 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 778 ZGB

Steht dem Berechtigten ein ausschliessliches Wohnrecht zu, so trägt er die Lasten des gewöhnlichen Unterhaltes.

Hat er nur ein Mitbenutzungsrecht, so fallen die Unterhaltskosten dem Eigentümer zu.

← Art. 777 ZGB Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB) Art. 779 ZGB →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)

VSBES.2023.256 · so (Art. 778 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Supplementary Benefits Appeal: Imputed Rental Value Calculation Error
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the usufruct holder bears the costs for ordinary maintenance if they have exclusive occupancy.
VSBES.2023.256 · so (Art. 778 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Supplementary Benefits Appeal: Imputed Rental Value Calculation Error
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the owner bears maintenance costs if the usufruct holder only has co-occupancy rights.
VSBES.2023.256 · so (Art. 778 ZGB)
Supplementary Benefits Appeal: Imputed Rental Value Calculation Error
Cited in the reasoning to determine the allocation of property maintenance costs based on the nature of the usufruct right, which impacted the calculation of recognized expenses.
LC200013 · zh (Art. 778 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Child Custody and Support Modification After Divorce: Parental Authority, Visitation, and Spousal Support Adjustment
Used analogously to determine that the owner (Grundeigentümer) bears the burden of extraordinary maintenance costs, thus granting the owner the right to select contractors.
LF180038 · zh (Art. 778 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Right of Residence Dispute and Eviction Proceedings Appeal
Cited in the context of the appellants' argument that an exclusive right of use should be presumed.
ZL.2015.00128 · zh (Art. 778 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Lifelong Right of Residence Treated as Income for Supplementary Benefits
Cited to establish the obligation of the resident to bear maintenance costs.
BO.2015.53 · sg (Art. 778 i.V.m. Art. 764 Abs. 2 und 3 ZGB)
Residence Right Holder v. Property Owners: Extraordinary Repairs and Right to Restoration
These provisions were cited as the basis for the claim that the owners could not be obligated to carry out the requested renovation works.
BO.2015.53 · sg (Art. 778 i.V.m. Art. 764 Abs. 2 und 3 ZGB)
Resident's Suit for Mandatory Repairs on Jointly Owned Property Remanded for Factual Findings on Hindrance of Residence Right
These articles establish that the property owner is not obligated to carry out extraordinary repairs, leading to the dismissal of the claim to compel performance based on these provisions.
HC.2013.402 · vd (Art. 778 al. 1 CC)
Spousal and Child Support Calculation Appeal (Income Inclusion and Expense Deductions)
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the maintenance obligations of the holder of a right of habitation.
SGSTA.2002.106 · so (Art. 778 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Right of Residence Holder's Deductible Renovation Costs
The court used this article to discuss the default rule for maintenance cost liability, which the parties contractually deviated from, but it was explicitly cited in the header/context of the decision used for review.
33.2022.26 · ti (Art. 778 cpv. 2 CC)
PC Claimant v. Equalization Fund: Denial of Supplementary Benefits Upheld Due to Insufficient Proof of Housing and Maintenance Expenses
Cited concerning the division of maintenance costs between the bare owner (insured) and the usufructuary/inhabitant in cases of cohabitation.
LC200013 · zh (Art. 778 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Modification of Ancillary Divorce Consequences Amid High Financial Disparity and Conflict
Cited in the reasoning regarding who bears the burden of ordinary maintenance under an exclusive right of residence.