Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
210 ZGBCC CH

Art. 680 Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB)

ZGB; Erste Abteilung: Das Eigentum; Neunzehnter Titel: Das Grundeigentum; Zweiter Abschnitt: Inhalt und Beschränkung des Grundeigentums; B. Beschränkungen; I. Im Allgemeinen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (1,277 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 680 ZGB

Die gesetzlichen Eigentumsbeschränkungen bestehen ohne Eintrag im Grundbuch.

Ihre Aufhebung oder Abänderung durch Rechtsgeschäft bedarf zur Gültigkeit der öffentlichen Beurkundung und der Eintragung in das Grundbuch.

Ausgeschlossen ist die Aufhebung oder Abänderung von Eigentumsbeschränkungen öffentlich-rechtlichen Charakters.

← Art. 679a ZGB Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB) Art. 681 ZGB →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (28)

VVGE.1966.70.Nr.26 · ow (Art. 680 Abs. 3 ZGB)
Private Contract Cannot Override Building Law Setback Requirements
Cited as the basis for the principle that privately agreed-upon limitations of ownership cannot override public-law restrictions imposed by the building law.
VVGE.1966.70.Nr.27 · ow (Art. 680 Abs. 3 ZGB)
Land Registrar's Duty to Refuse Registration of Public Law Violations
Cited to establish that public-law restrictions on ownership cannot be modified by contractual agreements.
BRGE.III.Nr.0076.20 · zh (Art. 680 ff. ZGB)
Municipality's Right of First Refusal on Composite Property Transfer Upheld
Cited for the general regulation of statutory rights of first refusal, providing context for § 64 PBG.
A/3043/2022 · ge (Art. 680 al. 1 CC)
Municipality v. Accelerated Building Permit: Servitude Violation Annulment
The servitude is qualified as an indirect legal restriction on property according to this article.
HC.2023.60 · vd (art. 680 al. 2 CC)
Property Owner Granted Right of Passage Despite Zoning Restrictions
Cited in the reasoning regarding renunciation of the legal servitude, but not explicitly in the final orders.
AC.2020.0304 · vd (art. 680 al. 1 CC)
Appeal Against Building Permit Due to Unlawful Parcel Subdivision and Exceeded Floor Area Ratio
Cited in the reasoning to establish that public law restrictions exist independently of their inscription in the land register, which supports the decision regarding the consequence of the non-compliant subdivision.
R 2019 32 · gr (Art. 680 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Building Permit Appeal Regarding Zoning and Second Homes Act Compliance
Cited in the reasoning concerning the declaratory nature of the registration of public-law property restrictions, which informs the decision to order registration.
101 2020 325 · fr (Art. 680 al. 2 CC)
Cantonal Court Review of Spousal Support and Child Maintenance Adjustments
This provision regarding the dissolution of the matrimonial regime was not cited in the operative part.
LB180042 · zh (Art. 680 Abs. 3 ZGB)
Property Development Violates Settlement Character Servitude
Cited regarding the impossibility of modifying or annulling property restrictions of a public law nature through servitudes.
LB180042 · zh (Art. 680 Abs. 3 ZGB)
Property Development Violates Settlement Character Servitude
Cited regarding the nullity of servitudes that contravene mandatory public law restrictions.
LB140087 · zh (Art. 680 ZGB)
Estate Executor v. Property Owner Regarding Building Restriction Easement Validity
Although the judgment itself (in the dispositive) does not cite this provision, the entire appeal concerns the confirmation of a judgment regarding the extinction of an encumbrance (Dienstbarkeit), which falls under the scope of this legal area (Art. 736 ZGB was discussed in the reasoning, leading to the confirmation of the previous judgment).
NP130015 · zh (Art. 680 N 2, N 21 und 24ff. (BSK ZGB II-Rey/Strebel))
Right-of-Way Width and Boundary Obstructions Dispute
Cited in the reasoning section to support the possibility of concluding obligations regarding property restrictions informally or tacitly.
TDSIO C1 12 238 · vs (art. 680 al. 2 CC)
Municipality Servitude Void for Lack of Authentic Form
Cited in the reasoning regarding private law restrictions, crucial for the application of Art. 975 CC, but not explicitly cited in the final orders (Order 1 refers to the *radiation* based on the finding of nullity, not the specific nullity rule itself in the dispositive).
TDSIO C1 12 238 · vs (art. 680 al. 2 CC)
Municipality Servitude Void for Lack of Authentic Form
The court used this provision to establish that the private contract modifying the legal land restriction was null because it lacked the required notarized form, justifying the admission of the claim under Art. 975 CC.
TDSIO C1 12 238 · vs (art. 680 al. 3 CC)
Municipality Servitude Void for Lack of Authentic Form
Cited in the reasoning regarding the intangibility of public law restrictions, not in the dispositive orders.