Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
210 ZGBCC CH

Art. 647e Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB)

ZGB; Erste Abteilung: Das Eigentum; Achtzehnter Titel: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; C. Gemeinschaftliches Eigentum; I. Miteigentum; 5. Bauliche Massnahmen; c. Der Verschönerung und Bequemlichkeit dienende
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (1,277 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 647e ZGB

Bauarbeiten, die lediglich der Verschönerung, der Ansehnlichkeit der Sache oder der Bequemlichkeit im Gebrauch dienen, dürfen nur mit Zustimmung aller Miteigentümer ausgeführt werden.

Werden solche Arbeiten mit Zustimmung der Mehrheit aller Miteigentümer, die zugleich den grösseren Teil der Sache vertritt, angeordnet, so können sie auch gegen den Willen eines nicht zustimmenden Miteigentümers ausgeführt werden, sofern dieser durch sie in seinem Nutzungs- und Gebrauchsrecht nicht dauernd beeinträchtigt wird, und die übrigen Miteigentümer ihm für eine bloss vorübergehende Beeinträchtigung Ersatz leisten und seinen Kostenanteil übernehmen.

← Art. 647d ZGB Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB) Art. 648 ZGB →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (29)

110 2023 38 · be (Art. 647e Abs. 1 ZGB)
Building Permit for CBD Facility Requires Unanimous Co-owner Consent for Shared Property Modifications
Cited in the reasoning supporting the determination that the planned measures qualified as luxurious measures requiring unanimous consent under Art. 10 Abs. 2 BewD.
C1 21 113 · vs (art. 647e CC)
Property Owner v. Co-Owners Regarding Wastewater Pipe Modification
Cited in the reasoning regarding required authorization for works, but not in the final operative orders.
BE.2021.21 · sg (Art. 647e Abs. 1 ZGB)
Co-owner's EV Charging Station Installation Requires Majority Consent
Cited by the lower court reasoning regarding the consent required for luxurious structural measures, which formed the basis for the judgment.
BE.2021.21 · sg (Art. 647e Abs. 1 ZGB)
Co-Owner Consent Required for EV Charging Infrastructure Installation in Common Garage
Cited by the lower court and confirmed as relevant to the needed consent for luxurious structural measures, though ultimately not the decisive provision for the outcome regarding the specific measure.
ZK1 2020 176 · gr (Art. 647e Abs. 1 ZGB)
Condominium Owner Expansion Authorization Dispute
The court confirmed the annulment of the challenged resolutions because they required the consent of all co-owners, which was not achieved, as they were qualified as luxurious measures.
ZWR 2020 S 249 257 · vs (Art. 647e ZGB)
Co-Owner Dispute Over Roof Renovation Necessity
This article was implicitly used to categorize the requested renovation as luxurious (and thus unnecessary for the community) because it served the exclusive private interest of the plaintiffs.
C3 18 198 · vs (Art. 647e ZGB)
Co-Owner Dispute Over Permissible Immissions from Common Area Structure
Mentioned by the opposing party in the context of whether the measure should have been decided unanimously, and used by the court to classify the measure as not luxurious.
KGVS C3 18 198 · vs (Art. 647e ZGB)
Co-Owner Grill Construction and Standing for Common Property Dispute
Cited during the assessment of the necessary quorum for luxurious building measures, though ultimately left open in the final ruling.
11.2016.104 · ti (art. 647e cpv. 1 CC)
Owner v. Condominium Assembly regarding Facade Renovation Method and Voting Validity
This provision on voluptuary construction works in co-ownership was cited in the reasoning that supported the rejection of the appeal.
HC.2017.904 · vd (Art. 647e CC)
Co-owner Pool Construction vs. Common Property Consent
This provision defined the nature of the works (sumptuary works) which was the subject of the dispute, although the appeal was ultimately rejected on other grounds.
A/2020/2013 · ge (art. 647e al. 1 CC)
Property Owner Challenge to Expert Appointment in Protected Listing Appeal
Cited to define 'travaux de construction pour l’embellissement et la commodité' (somptuaires) regarding the scope of the expert mission.
101 2015 226 · fr (art. 647e CC)
Co-owner Standing to Sue for Damages to Common Property
Cited in the reasoning regarding the limits of the administration's powers concerning PPE works.
C/4833/2014 · ge (art. 647e al. 1 CC)
Condominium Association Improvement Dispute: Useful vs. Somptuary Work
The court implicitly used this article when determining that the creation of a twelfth landing (a luxurious work) required unanimity.
AbR.1986.87.Nr.7 · ow (Art. 647e ZGB)
Condominium Resolution Enforcement Blocked by Administrator's Contractual Ambiguity
Cited in relation to the requirement for qualified majority for certain decisions, specifically if the telephone connection is considered a matter of convenience.
LB120061 · zh (Art. 647e ZGB)
Property Owner Challenges Glass Railing Resolution for Aesthetic and Bird Safety Concerns
The court considered the classification of building measures according to necessary, useful, or luxurious, which is regulated by this article, and its exception in paragraph 2.