Art. 379 Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB)

VVGE.2003.04.Nr.8 · ow (Art. 379 ZGB)

Custody Removal Upheld Due to Parental Neglect and Harm

This article, in conjunction with Art. 376 ZGB, was cited to determine the competent guardianship authority when parental custody is withdrawn.

PA170032 · zh (Art. 379 ZGB)

Appeal Regarding Judicial Review of Non-Consensual Medical Measures During Involuntary Psychiatric Placement

Cited in the reasoning regarding the rules for urgent treatment under Art. 377 ff. ZGB, which the court contrasted with the Art. 435 ZGB procedure.

Arr.t.2012.872 · vd (Art. 379 al. 1 CC)

Guardian Appointment Opposition Due to Excessive Burden and Relative Inaptitude Upheld

The decision relies on this article (concerning the aptitude/relative incapacity of the curator) as an additional ground for dispensing the opposed party from the curatorship.

Arr.t.2012.803 · vd (Art. 379 CC)

Guardian Appointment Upheld Despite Caregiver's Demands

The court considered the applicant's relative inability (inaptitude relative) in relation to the requirement that the curator be fit for the function.

Arr.t.2012.727 · vd (Art. 379 ss CC)

Appeal Regarding Appointment of Curator for Elderly Father

Cited in the initial header and reasoning regarding curator nomination, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders (I-V).

Arr.t.2012.628 · vd (Art. 379 ss et 388 CC)

Guardianship Appointment Upheld Despite Professional Burden

These articles govern the appointment of a guardian and the procedure for opposition, forming the basis for rejecting the opposition and confirming the lower court's decision.

Arr.t.2012.601 · vd (Art. 379 al. 1 CC)

Guardian Appointment Appeal Over Personal Circumstances

This provision defines the requirement for the appointed person to be fit for the function, which was central to rejecting the appellant's objection regarding his relative inability.

Arr.t.2012.569 · vd (art. 379 ss et 388 CC)

Appeal Against Curator Appointment Rejected

Cited in the initial note, these articles concerning nomination, refusal, and opposition to curatorship/guardianship form the core substantive legal basis of the decision to reject the opposition.

Arr.t.2012.356 · vd (Art. 379 ss CC)

Curatorship Opposition Based on Personal Burdens Rejected

Cited in the introductory legal references related to the appointment of the curator.

Arr.t.2011.1269 · vd (Art. 379 CC)

Conservator Appointment Opposition Upheld

The main legal ground for rejecting the appeal is based on the interpretation of the requirements for the aptitude of the curator under this article, as the appeal implicitly invoked her relative inaptitude based on this provision.

Arr.t.2011.1247 · vd (Art. 379 ss, 388, 392 ch. 1 et 393 ch. 2 CC)

Curatorship Appointment Over Relative's Objection Due to Financial Instability

These articles set the legal basis for the initial curatorship establishment and are implicitly referenced by the confirmation of the decision concerning the appointment.

Arr.t.2011.1195 · vd (art. 379 ss CC)

Appeal Regarding Guardianship Conversion and Opposition to Appointment

These articles address the general requirements for the appointment of a guardian/curator, which were implicitly central to the opposition regarding the proposed curator's fitness.

Arr.t.2011.1037 · vd (Art. 379 CC)

Guardian Appointment Appeal Regarding Professional Overextension

This article defines the required fitness for the appointment, which the appellant implicitly challenged.

Arr.t.2011.1037 · vd (Art. 379 al. 1 CC)

Guardian Appointment Appeal Regarding Professional Overextension

This provision establishes the requirement that a tutor/curator must be fit to fulfill their duties, and the appellant implicitly invoked their relative inability under this article.

Arr.t.2011.947 · vd (Art. 379 al. 1 CC)

Guardian Appointment Annulled Due to Medical Incapacity

The court annulled the designation based on the appellant's relative incapacity, which is implicitly linked to this article defining who should be appointed guardian/curator.