Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
210 ZGBCC CH

Art. 29 Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB)

ZGB; Erster Titel: Die natürlichen Personen; Erster Abschnitt: Das Recht der Persönlichkeit; B. Schutz der Persönlichkeit; III. Recht auf den Namen; 1. Namensschutz
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (1,277 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 29 ZGB

Wird jemandem die Führung seines Namens bestritten, so kann er auf Feststellung seines Rechtes klagen.

Wird jemand dadurch beeinträchtigt, dass ein anderer sich seinen Namen anmasst, so kann er auf Unterlassung dieser Anmassung sowie bei Verschulden auf Schadenersatz und, wo die Art der Beeinträchtigung es rechtfertigt, auf Leistung einer Geldsumme als Genugtuung klagen.

← Art. 28l ZGB Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB) Art. 30 ZGB →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (27)

C/6990/2023 · ge (Art. 29 al. 2 CC)
Surname Use in Restaurant Name Dispute
This article, concerning the action to cease name usurpation, was cited as the substantive basis for the initial claim, the failure of which justified confirming the dismissal of the provisional measures sought by the appellant.
HG190039 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
A.____ vs. B.____ Trademark Infringement and Validity
Cited in the reasoning, leading to the dismissal of claims based on name law in the dispositive.
HG190212 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
A._____ Companies v. B._____ GmbH Name and Domain Infringement
Basis for prohibiting the defendant from using the signs specified as company identifiers or in business dealings.
ZKBER.2019.55 · so (Art. 29 ZGB)
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Provisional Measures in Divorce: Custody and Marital Home Eviction Upheld
Cited in the reasoning when the appellant invoked their right to personality (Persönlichkeitsrecht).
ZK.2016.5 · bs (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Landlord v. Former Tenants: Trademark Infringement and Void Trademark Based on Invalid Lease Clause
The substantive right (protection against appropriation of a name) underpinning the application of Art. 2 lit. d MSchG in the counterclaim for invalidity.
C/20925/2017 · ge (art. 29 al. 2 CC)
Association v. Political Party: Acronym Confusion Injunction
Underlying legal basis for the prohibition granted regarding the right to a name, as confirmed by the facts established in the reasoning.
16.2017.PHC · vd (art. 29 al. 2 CC)
Investment Firm v. Swiss Company (Trade Name Confusion)
Cited by the applicant as a basis for protection against the use of their name (usurpation).
HG130037 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Financial Institution v. Domain Name Registrant
Used as the legal basis for the court's decision on name protection and the prohibition of using the C._____ sign.
HE130235 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Verein A1. v. Swiss Hostels Preliminary Injunction Denial
Cited in the requests as a basis for the demand for removal and destruction of materials related to the name (Request 1).
HG110102 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Insurance Group v. Brokerage: Trademark and Name Infringement via Domain Name
Underlies the granted injunctions (Orders 1 and 2) and the order for transfer (Order 3) based on the violation of the claimant's name right.
11.2008.135 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 CC)
Surname Dispute Following Foreign Name Change
The appeal was decided based on this article, which governs actions to cease the usurpation of one's name.
HG090317 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Keytrade AG v. Keytrade Bank SA (Swiss Branch Name Infringement)
Cited in the reasoning leading to order 2, as the basis for the claim to prohibit the defendant from using certain designations for its services (alternative to trademark law).
AP.2010.22 · vd (Art. 29 CC)
Bankruptcy Estate v. Individual: Domain Name Ownership Dispute
The substantive provision used to qualify the domain name as a commercial name, although this is mentioned in the reasoning and not explicitly in the dispositive, the provision is listed at the start of the decision, often indicating the main legal framework for the substance of the dispute which the court upheld by rejecting the claim in I.
C/1900/2008 · ge (art. 28 et 29 CC)
Ocean Beauty v. OCEANE INSTITUT GENEVE SARL
Cited in the reasoning section as the basis for the claimant's claims regarding trade name protection, but not explicitly cited in the operative part.
C/1900/2008 · ge (art. 29 al. 2 CC)
Ocean Beauty v. OCEANE INSTITUT GENEVE SARL
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the action to cease interference with a trade name, but not explicitly cited in the operative part.