210
ZGBCC
CH
CH
Art. 28g Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB)
ZGB; Erster Titel: Die natürlichen Personen; Erster Abschnitt: Das Recht der Persönlichkeit; B. Schutz der Persönlichkeit; II. Gegen Verletzungen; 4. Recht auf Gegendarstellung; a. Grundsatz
Art. 28g ZGB
Wer durch Tatsachendarstellungen in periodisch erscheinenden Medien, insbesondere Presse, Radio und Fernsehen, in seiner Persönlichkeit unmittelbar betroffen ist, hat Anspruch auf Gegendarstellung.
Kein Anspruch auf Gegendarstellung besteht, wenn über öffentliche Verhandlungen einer Behörde wahrheitsgetreu berichtet wurde und die betroffene Person an den Verhandlungen teilgenommen hat.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (31)
HG250037 · zh (Art. 28g Abs. 1 ZGB)
Book Retailer v. Publisher: Right of Counterstatement and Trade Secret Protection
Basis for the right to counter-statement when personal rights are directly affected by factual statements in periodic media.
C/6541/2016 · ge (Art. 28g CC)
Employee Dismissal Upheld for Massive Data Download Breach of Loyalty
Cited to reject the subsidiary claim for a right of reply concerning the press article.
HC.2018.1211 · vd (art. 28g CC)
Appellant v. Periodical Publisher: Right of Reply for Misrepresented Satirical Statement
The appeal was partially admitted based on the right of response provision, which was the core subject of the claim.
LF180057 · zh (Art. 28g ZGB)
Publisher v. Online News Outlet (Right of Reply)
The court references this article in the reasoning to justify that the chosen text for the right of reply was necessary and suitable to oppose the impression created by the contested article concerning personal facts.
AbR.1986.87.Nr.2 · ow (Art. 28g Abs. 1 ZGB)
Media Company Correction Does Not Negate Counter-Statement Right; Politician's Recusal Statement Subject to Counter-Statement, But Only if Personally Relevant
Cited as the legal basis for the right to counter-representation when a person's personality is directly affected by factual statements in the media.
2014.04.15.zr.1 · bl (Art. 28g Abs. 1 ZGB)
Foundation Denied Right of Reply Over Media Article
Establishes the right to a counter-statement for individuals directly affected by factual statements in periodic media.
2014.04.15.zr.2 · bl (Art. 28g Abs. 1 ZGB)
Foundation's Political Intentions Proven in Defamation Case
This article establishes the right to a counterstatement for individuals directly affected by factual statements in regularly published media, forming the basis for the legal claim.
400.14.32 · bl (Art. 28g Abs. 1 ZGB)
Foundation's Claim for Counter-Statement Dismissed Over Opinion and Factual Association
Foundation for the right to a counter-statement when personally affected by factual statements in periodic media.
400.14.33 · bl (Art. 28g Abs. 1 ZGB)
Foundation's Counter-Statement Against Political Allegations Denied
Basis for the right to a counter-statement for individuals affected by factual statements in the media.
HC.2012.498 · vd (Art. 28g al. 1 CC)
Appellant v. Media Company (Right of Reply Regarding Diamond Allegations)
The appeal was admitted because the appellant was entitled to exercise her right of reply based on this provision.
HC.2011.299 · vd (Art. 28g CC)
Company Appeal on Denial of Right of Reply to Critical Media Reports
The court considered the conditions for the right of reply under this article in relation to the appeal.
ERZ 2011 6 · gr (Art. 28g Abs. 1 ZGB)
Insurer's Right of Reply in Comparative Rankings Dispute
This provision establishes the right to a right of reply (Gegendarstellung) for persons immediately affected by factual statements in periodic media, which justifies the overall decision to uphold the obligation to publish.
11.2004.92 · ti (art. 28g cpv. 1 CC)
Appellant v. Former Colleague (Right of Reply Scope)
The right of reply is based on this article, which is the core subject of the litigation regarding the response to the challenged publication.
11.1998.99 · ti (art. 28g cpv. 1 CC)
Lawyers' Organization v. Magazine on Right of Reply Sufficiency
This provision, concerning the right to reply, was invoked in the reasoning to determine the merits of the substantive appeal (though the appeal was ultimately rejected).
11.1995.248 · ti (art. 28g CC)
Newspaper Publisher v. Right of Reply Applicant Regarding Waste Disposal Articles
This provision defines the right to reply, which is the core subject matter decided in the dispositive (Order 1).