Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
210 ZGBCC CH

Art. 248 Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB)

ZGB; Erste Abteilung: Das Eherecht; Sechster Titel: Das Güterrecht der Ehegatten; Vierter Abschnitt: Die Gütertrennung; A. Verwaltung, Nutzung und Verfügung; II. Beweis
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (1,277 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 248 ZGB

Wer behauptet, ein bestimmter Vermögenswert sei Eigentum des einen oder andern Ehegatten, muss dies beweisen.

Kann dieser Beweis nicht erbracht werden, so wird Miteigentum beider Ehegatten angenommen.

← Art. 247 ZGB Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB) Art. 249 ZGB →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (8)

BK 2024 180 · be (Art. 248 ZGB)
Husband v. Wife: Theft of Jewelry and Cash from Safe Deposit Boxes in Matrimonial Dispute
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the burden of proof for property ownership in the context of the seizure/search justification.
HC.2020.425 · vd (Art. 248 CC)
Divorce Asset Division Appeal Regarding Locked Box Cash, Car Sale Proceeds, and Tax Payments
Cited as the main rule concerning the burden of proof for property ownership between spouses when the marriage is under the separation of property regime, leading to the presumption of co-ownership for the disputed sum in the safe.
C/8754/2016 · ge (art. 248 al. 1 CC)
Divorce Property Liquidation and Spousal Support Appeal
Cited regarding the presumption of ownership for co-owned property registered in a spouse's name.
HC.2016.226 · vd (Art. 248 al. 2 CC)
Divorce Asset Division Appeal: Property, Debt, and Pension Entitlements
Cited in the preamble and used to explain the presumption of co-ownership when the financing source of an asset is not proven, supporting the rejection of the appellant's claim regarding the 53,000 fr. down payment.
CC.2003.124 · ne (art. 248 al.1 CC)
Divorce Maintenance and Pension Security Ruling
Cited in reasoning regarding the burden of proof for self-owned assets in a separation of property regime.
CC.2003.124 · ne (art. 248 al.2 CC)
Divorce Maintenance and Pension Security Ruling
Cited in reasoning regarding the presumption of co-ownership if proof of ownership is lacking.
CC.2003.66 · ne (Art. 248 al.1 CC)
Divorce Appeal: Spousal Support Duration and Property Division Concerning Company Shares
This article was used to establish the burden of proof for property ownership in the context of the property liquidation dispute.
11.1997.153 · ti (Art. 248 cpv. 2 CC)
Maternity Custody Upheld, Spousal Support Reduced, Child Support Increased in Divorce Appeal
Cited as the basis for presuming joint ownership over certain household goods where proof of exclusive property was lacking.