Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
210 ZGBCC CH

Art. 124b Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB)

ZGB; Erste Abteilung: Das Eherecht; Vierter Titel: Die Ehescheidung und die Ehetrennung; Dritter Abschnitt: Die Scheidungsfolgen; D. Berufliche Vorsorge; V. Ausnahmen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (1,277 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 124b ZGB

Die Ehegatten können in einer Vereinbarung über die Scheidungsfolgen von der hälftigen Teilung abweichen oder auf den Vorsorgeausgleich verzichten, wenn eine angemessene Alters- und Invalidenvorsorge gewährleistet bleibt.

Das Gericht spricht dem berechtigten Ehegatten weniger als die Hälfte der Austrittsleistung zu oder verweigert die Teilung ganz, wenn wichtige Gründe vorliegen. Ein wichtiger Grund liegt insbesondere vor, wenn die hälftige Teilung unbillig wäre: 1. aufgrund der güterrechtlichen Auseinandersetzung oder der wirtschaftlichen Verhältnisse nach der Scheidung; 2. aufgrund der Vorsorgebedürfnisse, insbesondere unter Berücksichtigung des Altersunterschiedes zwischen den Ehegatten.

Das Gericht kann dem berechtigten Ehegatten mehr als die Hälfte der Austrittsleistung zusprechen, wenn er nach der Scheidung gemeinsame Kinder betreut und der verpflichtete Ehegatte weiterhin über eine angemessene Alters- und Invalidenvorsorge verfügt.

← Art. 124a ZGB Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB) Art. 124c ZGB →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (133)

C/12805/2023 · ge (art. 124b al. 2 CC)
Equitable Indemnity Following Undividable Pension Fund Withdrawal in Divorce
Used implicitly in the reasoning to reject the appellant's claim for renunciation of indemnity, as the conditions for inequity were not met.
C/12147/2023 · ge (art. 124b al. 2 CC)
Pension Division Adjustment Due to Foreign Assets in Divorce
The court confirmed the first instance judge's decision to limit the sharing of professional pension assets based on equity, which is provided for in this article.
C1 22 299 · vs (art. 124b CC)
Divorce Decree Upheld: Child Custody, Pension Equalization Confirmed, Property Division Finalized
The central provision contested by the appellant regarding the deviation from the half-share division of professional pension assets, although ultimately confirmed in the dispositive.
C1 23 208 · vs (art. 124b al. 2 CC)
Prescription of Claim to Divide Unadjudicated Occupational Benefits Following Foreign Divorce Decree
Cited in the reasoning to explain the court's power to refuse the division of pension assets, which supports the final decision to reject the claim based on prescription.
C/2925/2021 · ge (Art. 124b al. 2 CC)
Divorce Appeal: Curatorship Overturned, Child Support Adjusted, Pension Division Upheld, Property Liquidation Modified
Allows for deviations from the equal division of occupational benefits for just cause, particularly considering the spouses' post-divorce economic situation or their respective pension needs (e.g., significant age difference).
C/18121/2021 · ge (art. 124b CC)
Divorce Judgment Appeal: Property Division, Spousal and Child Support, Pension Equalization Modification
Cited in relation to the judge's power to deviate from the principle of equal sharing of pension assets based on equity.
FO.2022.11.K2 · sg (Art. 124b Abs. 2 ZGB)
Disability Pension Equalization and Life-Shaping Marriage Support Determination
The court's analysis regarding spousal maintenance duration (phase c) implicitly relies on balancing factors that justify limiting maintenance under Art. 125 ZGB, which is intrinsically linked to the reasoning used in the maintenance part of the judgment, although the main ground for the final maintenance outcome rests on Art. 125 ZGB.
FO.2023.15.K2 · sg (Art. 124b Abs. 2 ZGB)
Husband's Appeal on Property Division and Pension in Divorce Following Prior Sham Marriage Finding
Although cited in the reasoning regarding the denial of pension splitting, this provision was not explicitly used in the final orders (dispositive) for the final ruling on pension sharing.
C/85/2022 · ge (art. 124b CC)
French Divorce Decree Enforcement and Swiss Pension Division Dispute
The main ground for confirming the lower court's decision to deviate from the half-share principle in the pension splitting.
C/18947/2019 · ge (art. 124b al. 2 CC)
Mother Retains Custody and Joint Authority; Child Support Increased in Divorce Appeal
Cited in the context of the respondent's alternative claim to exclude the pension split, which the court ultimately rejected by confirming the initial ruling.
C/18947/2019 · ge (art. 124b al. 2 CC)
Mother Retains Custody and Joint Authority; Child Support Increased in Divorce Appeal
The court implicitly rejected the respondent's appeal for renunciation of the pension split by confirming the previous ruling based on the principle of equal sharing (as no 'justes motifs' were found).
C/14490/2021 · ge (art. 124b CC)
Appeal Regarding Divorce Judgment: Child Support, Marital Home Sale, and Property/Pension Division
Cited regarding the judge's discretion to deviate from the principle of equal sharing based on equity.
C1 20 94 · vs (art. 124b al. 2 CC)
Custody and Support Modifications in International Relocation Divorce
Cited in the dispositive (Order 7) for renouncing the division of pension fund exit benefits.
C/15740/2022 · ge (art. 124b CC)
Pension Annuity Division upon Divorce Appeal
Cited implicitly via the context of the discussion on deviating from the principle of half-share division due to equitable considerations, which is the main basis for reforming the previous order regarding pension splitting.
ZOR.2023.24 · ag (Art. 124b Abs. 2 Ziff. 1 ZGB)
Divorce Case: Property Sale Proceeds, Equalization Payment, and Pension Division Modified on Appeal
Cited in the lower court's decision to deny the division of occupational pensions, which was overturned and remanded by the appellate court.