173.71
STBOGLOAP
CH
CH
Art. 75 Bundesgesetz vom 19. März 2010 über die Organisation der Strafbehörden des Bundes (StBOG) - Vollzug durch die Bundesanwaltschaft
StBOG; 4. Titel: Ergänzende Verfahrensbestimmungen
Art. 75 StBOG · Vollzug durch die Bundesanwaltschaft
Die Bundesanwaltschaft vollzieht die Entscheide der Strafbehörden des Bundes, wenn nicht die Kantone zuständig sind.
Sie bezeichnet dafür eine Stelle, die nicht mit der Untersuchung und Anklageerhebung betraut ist.
Sie kann für die Einziehung und Verwertung Dritte beiziehen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (25)
SK.2025.55 (Art. 75 Abs. 1 und 2 StBOG)
Defendant Ordered to Repay Full Cost of Court-Appointed Defense
This provision, in conjunction with Art. 74 StBOG (e contrario), establishes the responsibility of the Office of the Attorney General for the enforcement of procedural costs in federal criminal proceedings.
CA.2024.33 (Art. 75 StBOG)
Applicant Denied Cost Waiver Due to Insufficient Documentation and Lack of Changed Circumstances
Cited as the basis for the enforcement authority's discretion to grant payment facilities in the form of installment payments.
BB.2024.7 (art. 21 al. 1 RFPPF en lien avec l'art. 75 al. 1 LOAP)
Defendant's Appeal on Legal Costs Partially Granted
Cited as the legal basis for determining the compensation of legal fees for the appeal proceedings.
BB.2023.36 (art. 75 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Federal Criminal Court: Private Prosecutor Standing for State-Controlled Entities and File Access Restrictions
Cited in relation to the allocation of recoverable costs against the Public Prosecutor's Office.
BB.2023.39 (art. 75 al. 1 LOAP)
State-Controlled Company's Right to Intervene and Access Restrictions in Corruption Case
Cited in the dispositive to determine the allocation of costs for legal representation.
SK.2019.58 (art. 75 al. 1 LOAP)
Defendant Found Guilty of Corruption and Money Laundering, Sentenced to Suspended Imprisonment and Compensation
This provision is cited for communicating the judgment to the public prosecutor's office as the executing authority.
SK.2018.34 (art. 75 al. 1 LOAP)
Federal Criminal Court dismisses opposition to penal order due to lack of standing.
Relates to the public prosecutor's role as the executing authority.
SK.2018.36 (Art. 75 al. 1 LOAP)
Dissolved Company Lacks Standing to Oppose Account Confiscation
Cited regarding the communication of the decision to the public prosecutor for execution.
SK.2018.56 (Art. 75 StBOG)
Applicant's Request to Waive Legal Costs Denied Due to Unchanged Financial Circumstances
Mentioned in conjunction with Art. 442 Abs. 1 StPO regarding the discretion of the enforcement authority for payment deferrals or installment payments.
SK.2018.39 (Art. 75 StBOG)
Cost Waiver Denied for Criminal Organization Convict
Cited alongside Art. 442 Abs. 1 StPO regarding the executive authority's discretion on payment facilities or enforcement.
SK.2018.40 (Art. 75 StBOG)
Court Denies Waiver of Costs for Assault Conviction
Cited to inform the applicant about the enforcement authority's discretion regarding payment facilities.
SK.2017.78 (art. 75 al. 1 LOAP)
Late Opposition to Penalty Order Invalid
Cited for the communication of the decision to the executing authority.
SK.2017.34 (Art. 75 al. 1 StBOG)
Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Unascertained Legal Fee Debt
The court identified the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office as the competent authority for initiating the procedure for remission of costs in federal criminal proceedings.
SK.2016.33 (art. 75 al. 1 LOAP)
Highway Vignette Tampering Case Dismissed Due to Late Appeal
Cited to designate the authority responsible for enforcing the decision.
BB.2016.327 (Art. 75 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Complainant v. Prosecutor: Appeal of Non-Prosecution Order and Jurisdiction Ruling Dismissed
Cited in conjunction with Art. 21 cpv. 1 RSPPF for awarding reduced legal costs to the appellant.