Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
173.71 STBOGLOAP CH

Art. 63 Bundesgesetz vom 19. März 2010 über die Organisation der Strafbehörden des Bundes (StBOG) - Information

StBOG; 3. Titel: Gerichtsbehörden; 1. Kapitel: Bundesstrafgericht
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (83 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 63 StBOG · Information

Das Bundesstrafgericht informiert die Öffentlichkeit über seine Rechtsprechung.

Die Veröffentlichung der Entscheide hat grundsätzlich in anonymisierter Form zu erfolgen.

Das Bundesstrafgericht regelt die Grundsätze der Information in einem Reglement.

Für die Gerichtsberichterstattung kann das Bundesstrafgericht eine Akkreditierung vorsehen.

← Art. 62a StBOG Bundesgesetz vom 19. März 2010 über die Organisation der Strafbehörden des Bundes (StBOG) - Gegenstand und Geltungsbereich Art. 64 StBOG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)

BP.2025.35 (art. 63 al. 2 LOAP)
Enhanced Anonymization Request Rejected in Pre-Trial Detention Case
Cited as the basis for the court's obligation to publish its decisions, in principle, in anonymized form to protect the interests of the parties.
BB.2024.110 (art. 63 al. 2 LOAP)
Recusal Denied: Procedural Rulings and Language Insufficient to Prove Judicial Bias
This provision is cited as the basis for anonymizing the applicant's name in the decision.
BB.2024.126 (Art. 63 al. 2 LOAP)
Companies' Recusal Motions in Money Laundering Investigation Denied
Cited to justify the anonymization of the applicants' names in the publication of the decision.
BB.2024.66 (art. 63 LOAP)
Espionage Suspect's Appeal Against Surveillance Rejected
Cited regarding the Federal Criminal Court's duty to inform the public about its case law and the anonymization of judgments.
RR.2021.108 (Art. 63 Abs. 3 StBOG)
Witness Refuses Testimony, Appeal Dismissed
Used in conjunction with other provisions to determine the competence of the General Secretariat to decide on the deferral of the publication of the decision.
BV.2019.48 (Art. 63 Abs. 3 StBOG)
Appellant challenges BFE fine for unauthorized network data use, disclosure, and disciplinary proceedings.
This provision is cited in conjunction with Art. 10 Abs. 2 lit. d Organisationsreglement BstGerOR and Art. 2 Abs. 2 Informationsreglement BstGer to forward the request for non-publication.
BB.2018.130 (Art. 63 Abs. 3 StBOG)
Criminal Defendant's Appeal of Evidentiary and Transcript Rulings Denied
Relates to the forwarding of the request for postponement of publication to the relevant authority.
BB.2019.34 (Art. 63 Abs. 3 StBOG)
Official Misconduct and Document Forgery Case Appeal Dismissed
Relevant for requests concerning the publication of decisions.
BB.2019.49 (Art. 63 StBOG)
Mootness of Appeal for Disputed Discovery Documents
Cited in conjunction with other provisions for setting the court fee.
RR.2013.91 (art. 63 cpv. 1 LOAP)
International Judicial Assistance for Money Laundering Investigation
Cited to determine that costs follow the outcome of the appeal.
RR.2012.313 (Art. 63 cpv. 1 LOAP)
International Judicial Assistance for Italy: Account Freezing Upheld
Applied to order that costs follow the outcome of the case.
RR.2011.120 (Art. 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 39 Abs. 2 lit. b StBOG)
Germany v. Switzerland: Insufficient Factual Basis for Tax Evasion Assistance
Used to waive court fees for the appellants due to the outcome of the proceedings.
RH.2012.4 (Art. 63 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Extradition Arrest Warrant Upheld Amid Due Process Claims
Cited as the basis for applying the principle that costs follow the event in administrative proceedings.
TPF 2023 55 (Art. 63 al. 1 LOAP)
National Prosecuting Authority v. Federal Office of Justice (Switzerland Extradition)
Cited as the basis for the Federal Criminal Court informing the public of its jurisprudence.