173.71 STBOGLOAP

CH

Art. 59 Bundesgesetz vom 19. März 2010 über die Organisation der Strafbehörden des Bundes (StBOG) - Gerichtsschreiber und Gerichtsschreiberinnen

StBOG; 3. Titel: Gerichtsbehörden; 1. Kapitel: Bundesstrafgericht

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (83 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 59 StBOG · Gerichtsschreiber und Gerichtsschreiberinnen

Die Gerichtsschreiber und Gerichtsschreiberinnen wirken bei der Instruktion der Fälle und bei der Entscheidfindung mit. Sie haben beratende Stimme.

Sie erarbeiten unter der Verantwortung eines Richters oder einer Richterin Referate und redigieren die Entscheide des Bundesstrafgerichts.

Sie erfüllen weitere Aufgaben, die ihnen das Reglement überträgt.

← Art. 58 StBOG Bundesgesetz vom 19. März 2010 über die Organisation der Strafbehörden des Bundes (StBOG) - Gegenstand und Geltungsbereich Art. 60 StBOG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (10)

BB.2024.66 (art. 59 LOAP)

Espionage Suspect's Appeal Against Surveillance Rejected

Cited as the basis for the judicial duties of judges or clerks of the Federal Criminal Court.

BB.2024.63 (Art. 59 Abs. 1 lit. d i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Recusal of Obwalden Court of Appeal Judges Denied Due to Unsubstantiated Bias Claims

Basis for the Federal Criminal Court's jurisdiction to decide on recusal requests concerning an entire cantonal court of appeal.

CN.2022.16 (Art. 59 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Recusal of Court Clerks Due to Alleged Bias of Appellate Chamber President

Defines the role and participation of court clerks in case preparation and decision-making, including their advisory vote.

BB.2020.86 (Art. 59 Abs. 1 lit. b i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Company Fails to Prove Prosecutor Bias for Recusal

This provision governs the decision-making process by the Federal Criminal Court's appellate chamber in cases of recusal requests against the Federal Prosecutor's Office.

BB.2020.55 (Art. 59 Abs. 1 lit. b i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Prosecutorial Recusal Request Moot Due to Expired Charges

References the procedural rule for the decision-making body when the Federal Prosecutor's Office is affected by an application for recusal.

BB.2019.116 (Art. 59 Abs. 1 lit. d i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Recusal of Judges Based on Political and Ethical Viewpoints

The court referenced its own jurisdiction based on the cited provisions in the reasoning, but ultimately did not apply them to hear the case.

BB.2019.90 (Art. 59 Abs. 1 lit. b i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Prosecutor Not Disqualified Despite Allegations of Bias

Determines that the Federal Criminal Court's Complaints Chamber decides on applications for recusal against the Public Prosecutor's Office when grounds under Art. 56 lit. a or f StPO are invoked.

BB.2018.3 (Art. 59 Abs. 1 lit. b i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Prosecutor's Contacts with Witnesses' Representatives Not Grounds for Recusal

Determines that the Beschwerdekammer of the Federal Criminal Court decides on exclusion requests when the Attorney General's Office is involved.

BB.2017.106 (Art. 59 Abs. 1 lit. b i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Prosecutor Recusal Denied Despite Prior Complaint

Cited to establish the competence of the appellate chamber to decide on the recusal request when the Public Prosecutor's Office is involved.

BB.2017.138 (Art. 59 Abs. 1 lit. b i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Applicant's Recusal Request Denied for Untimeliness and Lack of Merit

This provision outlines the jurisdiction of the appellate chamber to decide on requests concerning the Public Prosecutor's Office, specifically when grounds for recusal under Art. 56 lit. a or f StPO are invoked.