173.41 PATGGLTFB

CH

Art. 23 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 2009 über das Bundespatentgericht (PatGG) - Einzelrichterin oder Einzelrichter

PatGG; 3. Kapitel: Organisation und Verwaltung

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (43 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 23 PatGG · Einzelrichterin oder Einzelrichter

Die Präsidentin oder der Präsident entscheidet als Einzelrichterin beziehungsweise Einzelrichter über: a. das Nichteintreten auf offensichtlich unzulässige Klagen; b. Gesuche um vorsorgliche Massnahmen; c. Gesuche um unentgeltliche Rechtspflege; d. die Abschreibung von Verfahren zufolge Gegenstandslosigkeit, Rückzugs, Anerkennung oder Vergleichs; e. Klagen auf Erteilung einer Lizenz nach Artikel 40 d des Patentgesetzes vom 25. Juni 1954 .

Er oder sie kann andere juristisch ausgebildete Richterinnen oder Richter oder die zweite hauptamtliche Richterin oder den zweiten hauptamtlichen Richter mit diesen oder einzelnen dieser Aufgaben betrauen.

Wenn die rechtlichen oder tatsächlichen Verhältnisse es erfordern, kann die Einzelrichterin beziehungsweise der Einzelrichter mit zwei weiteren Richterinnen oder Richtern in Dreierbesetzung entscheiden. Ist das Verständnis eines technischen Sachverhalts für den Entscheid von besonderer Bedeutung, muss in Dreierbesetzung entschieden werden.

← Art. 22 PatGG Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 2009 über das Bundespatentgericht (PatGG) - Grundsatz Art. 24 PatGG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (19)

S2023-011 (Art. 23 Abs. 3 PatGG)

Ferinject® Patent Dispute: Balancing Disclosure and Confidentiality

Cited as the basis for deciding in a three-judge panel due to the importance of technical understanding for the decision.

S2023-009 (art. 23 al. 1 let. b LTFB)

Pre-Trial Evidence Granted for Watch Balance Wheel Material

This provision grants the president the power to decide on requests for provisional measures as a single judge.

S2023-009 (art. 23 al. 3 LTFB)

Pre-Trial Evidence Granted for Watch Balance Wheel Material

This provision allows the president to sit with two other judges when technical understanding is necessary.

S2023-007 (art. 23 al. 1 let. b LTFB)

Patent Holder's Claims Against Licensee Denied Over Wind Technology Dispute

Specifies that the president acts as a single judge for provisional measures.

S2023-007 (art. 23 al. 3 LTFB)

Patent Holder's Claims Against Licensee Denied Over Wind Technology Dispute

States when the president does not need to rule with two other judges.

S2023-004--S2023-005 (Art. 23 Abs. 1 lit. a PatGG)

Federal Patent Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Non-Patent IP Claims

This provision establishes the competence of a single judge to decide on obviously inadmissible claims, which the court refers to in its procedural considerations.

S2023-004--S2023-005 (Art. 23 Abs. 3 PatGG)

Federal Patent Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Non-Patent IP Claims

This provision mandates that decisions on certain matters, including the specific jurisdiction issue at hand, must be made by a panel of three judges, which is invoked by the court for its decision.

S2022-006 (Art. 23 Abs. 1 lit. b PatGG)

Patent Holder's Claim for Preliminary Measures Denied Due to Lack of Legal Interest

This provision determines that the President decides as a single judge in this matter.

S2019-003 (art. 23 al. 1 let. b LTFB)

Provisional Measures Granted to Prevent Disposition of Patent Applications Pending Ownership Determination

Cited for the President to rule as a single judge.

S2019-006 (Art. 23 Abs. 1 lit. b PatGG)

Injunction Against Generic Drug Listing Pending Patent Expiration

Cited in the reasoning for the president to decide as a single judge.

S2018-003 (art. 23 al. 1 let. b LTFB)

Patent Applications: Prohibition on Disposal Extended

Grants the president the authority to decide on provisional measures as a single judge.

S2018-003 (art. 23 al. 2 LTFB)

Patent Applications: Prohibition on Disposal Extended

Requires a court composition of three judges when technical facts are important.

S2018-002 (Art. 23 Abs. 1 lit. b i.V.m. Abs. 3 PatGG)

Pharmaceuticals: Court Denies Urgent Recall Without Hearing Defendant

Cited in the reasoning to determine the composition of the court in a three-judge panel.

S2017-006 (Art. 23 Abs. 1 lit. b PatGG)

Pharmaceutical Company v. Competitor: Supplementary Protection Certificate Infringement

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the president deciding as a single judge.

O2016-016 (Art. 23 Abs. 1 Bst. a PatGG)

Dismissal of Third-Party Claims Due to Litispendence

Cited as a procedural basis for not entering into the claims, indicating a lack of procedural prerequisites.