Art. 52 Bundesgesetz vom 17. Juni 2005 über das Bundesverwaltungsgericht (VGG) - Koordination mit dem Versicherungsaufsichtsgesetz vom 17. Dezember 2004 (neues VAG)

V 2006 11 · gr (Art. 52 des Verwaltungsgerichtsgesetzes (VGG))

Municipal Council Closed Session on Privatization and Litigation Strategy Upheld

This provision was mentioned in the context of establishing the legitimacy/standing to appeal, which was conditionally considered.

R 2006 87 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Appeal Regarding Multi-Family House Permit and Setback Violations

Used to partially dismiss the appeal because the appellant was not aggrieved concerning the balcony issue.

R 2006 22 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Appeal Dismissed on Building Permit for Protective Wall Adjacent to Shared Path

Cited in the reasoning when addressing the issue of locus standi (Rekurslegitimation) for the heirs' community.

R 2006 6 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Forest Delineation Revision Timeliness

Cited in the reasoning to confirm the appellant's affected status by the decision not to enter a review.

R 2006 6 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Forest Delineation Revision Timeliness Appeal

Mentioned to confirm the appellant's standing to appeal the decision not to proceed with the revision request.

R 2005 85 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Property Owner v. Municipality (Parking Requirements for Vinotheque Cellar)

Cited in the reasoning section to establish the appellant's standing to appeal.

U 2005 43 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Municipal Council Refusal of Guesthouse License Due to Applicant's Poor Repute

Cited to deny standing for the appellant to assert third-party claims, as the standing requires a personal interest in the matter.

V 2005 1 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Challengers Lack Standing to Appeal Zoning Plan Amendment

Cited in reasoning when discussing the material interest required for third-party appeals, which was found lacking for the appellants.

R 2005 53 · gr (Art. 52 des Verwaltungsgerichtsgesetzes (VGG; BR 370.100))

Resident v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit for Civil Protection Siren

Although the appeal was dismissed on grounds of lack of standing, this provision governs who is entitled to file an appeal, which determined the outcome of the case (non-admission).

U 2005 40 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Water Protection Contracts Award Challenge

Cited to explain why the court could not rule on the appeal regarding one region due to lack of current interest in challenging the decision.

U 2005 40 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Consortium Challenge to Water Protection Contract Award Criteria Upheld in Part

Used to assess whether the appellant had a current interest in challenging the award decision for one of the regions.

R 2004 48 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Municipal Order for Unpermitted Structures in Agricultural Zone Upheld

Cited in the reasoning regarding the standing to appeal, confirming the requirement for a protectable interest for third-party appellants (though not explicitly in the operative part, it is cited in the context of procedural findings relating to the admitted appeal).

R 2004 83 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Appeal Against Modification of Provisional Watercourse Set-Back Requirement

Cited in the reasoning to establish the appellant's standing (legitimation) to file the appeal, allowing the court to rule on the merits.

U 2004 109 · gr (Art. 52 des Verwaltungsgerichtsgesetzes (VGG))

Municipality Refusal of Non-Resident Tenant's Valley Driving Permit Upheld

Cited as the basis for the appellant's legitimacy to file the appeal (though the appeal was ultimately dismissed).

R 2004 65 · gr (Art. 52 VGG)

Challenge to Building Permit Dismissed on Procedural, FAR, Height, and Encroachment Grounds

Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the appellants were authorized to file the appeal (though the final order only rules on the merits and costs).