173.32 VGGLTAF

CH

Art. 25 Bundesgesetz vom 17. Juni 2005 über das Bundesverwaltungsgericht (VGG) - Praxisänderung und Präjudiz

VGG; 1. Kapitel: Stellung und Organisation

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (58 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 25 VGG · Praxisänderung und Präjudiz

Eine Abteilung kann eine Rechtsfrage nur dann abweichend von einem früheren Entscheid einer oder mehrerer anderer Abteilungen entscheiden, wenn die Vereinigung der betroffenen Abteilungen zustimmt.

Hat eine Abteilung eine Rechtsfrage zu entscheiden, die mehrere Abteilungen betrifft, so holt sie die Zustimmung der Vereinigung aller betroffenen Abteilungen ein, sofern sie dies für die Rechtsfortbildung oder die Einheit der Rechtsprechung für angezeigt hält.

Beschlüsse der Vereinigung der betroffenen Abteilungen sind gültig, wenn an der Sitzung oder am Zirkulationsverfahren mindestens zwei Drittel der Richter und Richterinnen jeder betroffenen Abteilung teilnehmen. Der Beschluss wird ohne Parteiverhandlung gefasst und ist für die Antrag stellende Abteilung bei der Beurteilung des Streitfalles verbindlich.

← Art. 24 VGG Bundesgesetz vom 17. Juni 2005 über das Bundesverwaltungsgericht (VGG) - Grundsatz Art. 26 VGG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (48)

PKG 2001 25 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 1 und 4 VGG)

Bankruptcy Appeal: Applicable Legal Aid Rules and Counsel Compensation Rate

Cited as the basis for determining which authority (the President of the Court) is responsible for granting legal aid and setting the remuneration of the appointed counsel.

D-1701/2018 (Art. 17 i.V.m. Art. 25 Abs. 2 VGG)

Asylum Claim Rejected: Late Disclosure of Cousin's LTTE Ties Found Not Credible

Governs the coordination of jurisprudence between departments of the Federal Administrative Court.

E-1866/2015 (Art. 25 VGG)

Federal Administrative Court Upholds Deportation Order for Sri Lankan Asylum Seeker

Regulates the composition of the court and the decision-making process.

C-6175/2010 (Art. 25 Abs. 1 Bst. i VGG)

Liquidation Date and Beneficiary Inclusion in Distribution Plan

Cited as the basis for the Federal Administrative Court's jurisdiction over decisions of supervisory authorities in the area of occupational pensions.

U 2009 104 · gr (Art. 25 VGG)

Municipality Social Assistance Appeal Regarding Unlawful Pension Draw Condition

Mentioned as the primary basis for assessing the right to free legal aid, although the court ultimately relies on constitutional provisions.

U 2006 138 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 1 VGG)

Appeal for Residency Permit Denied Due to Risk of Public Charge and Criminal Record

Used to grant the appellant free conduct of proceedings because she could not cover the litigation costs.

U 2006 138 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 4 VGG)

Appeal for Residency Permit Denied Due to Risk of Public Charge and Criminal Record

Used to grant the appellant free legal representation for the proceedings before the Administrative Court.

S 2006 171 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 4 VGG)

Hotel Employee Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Regarding Mixed Assessment Method

Cited in the reasoning leading up to the decision to grant legal aid (unentgeltliche Verbeiständung).

U 2006 115 · gr (Art. 25 VGG)

Refusal to Reconsider Iraqi National's Residence Permit and Family Reunification Denied

Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for denying free legal aid because the case was obviously without prospect of success.

S 2006 130 · gr (Art. 25 Abs.1/4 VGG)

Appeal Dismissed: Disability Benefits Denial Upheld Based on Residual Earning Capacity

Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirements for granting free legal aid (justification) under the old law, which was ruled upon in Order 3.

U 2005 72 · gr (Art. 25 VGG)

Municipality Social Assistance Reduction Upheld Against Right to Be Heard and Subsidiarity Challenges

Used to grant the request for legal aid based on the applicant's inability to cover procedural costs while maintaining necessary living expenses.

S 2006 101 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 4 VGG)

Imputed Housing Benefit and Supplementary Benefits Denial

This provision was cited as the legal basis for granting the request for free legal aid due to proven need.

BK 2006 34 · gr (Art. 25 VGG)

Appeal Dismissed Against Discontinuation of Proceedings for Abuse of Office and Bodily Harm Against Police Officers

Cited in order 3 as part of the legal basis for granting the appellants free legal aid and appointing counsel.

S 2006 73 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 4 VGG)

Insured Person v. Accident Insurance Regarding Disability Pension Calculation

Cited along with Art. 61 lit. f ATSG as the basis for granting the appellant free legal representation.

A 2006 36 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 1 VGG)

Taxpayers' Appeal for Full Tax Waiver Dismissed Due to Sufficient Income and Future Earning Prospects

The request for legal aid (free legal assistance) was denied because the appeal was deemed not to have sufficient prospects of success.