173.110
BGGLTF
CH
CH
Art. 8 Bundesgesetz vom 17. Juni 2005 über das Bundesgericht (BGG) - Unvereinbarkeit in der Person
BGG; 1. Kapitel: Stellung und Organisation
Art. 8 BGG · Unvereinbarkeit in der Person
Dem Bundesgericht dürfen nicht gleichzeitig als Richter oder Richterinnen angehören: a. Ehegatten, eingetragene Partnerinnen oder Partner und Personen, die in dauernder Lebensgemeinschaft leben; b. Ehegatten oder eingetragene Partnerinnen oder Partner von Geschwistern und Personen, die mit Geschwistern in dauernder Lebensgemeinschaft leben; c. Verwandte in gerader Linie sowie bis und mit dem dritten Grad in der Seitenlinie; d. Verschwägerte in gerader Linie sowie bis und mit dem dritten Grad in der Seitenlinie.
Die Regelung von Absatz 1 Buchstabe d gilt bei dauernden Lebensgemeinschaften sinngemäss.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (55)
200 2023 389 · be (Art. 8 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG)
Invalidity Pension Calculation Appeal Regarding Earning Capacity Assessment and Age Deduction
The appeal was dismissed, meaning that the procedural provisions for rejecting the appeal are implicitly not cited in the dispositive of this cantonal decision.
D-7466/2024 (Art. 8 lett. d cifra 1 LTF)
Asylum Denial Upheld Due to Credibility Issues and Lack of Danger
Cited to state that the decision is final and cannot be appealed to the Federal Tribunal.
SK2 2024 62 · gr (Art. 8 BGG)
Attorney Access Appeal Mootness
Cited as part of the rules governing the procedure for an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
D-5075/2024 (Art. 8 Bst. d Ziff. 1 BGG)
Asylum Refusal Upheld: Greece Deemed Safe Return Destination
This provision is mentioned in the reasoning concerning the finality of the Federal Administrative Court's decisions in asylum matters.
F-4802/2024 (Art. 8 Bst. d Ziff. 1 BGG)
Asylum Seeker's Appeal Against Canton Assignment Dismissed Over Lack of Family Unity Claim
This provision establishes the finality of the Federal Administrative Court's decision in this type of matter.
D-3518/2023 (Art. 8 lett. d cifra 1 LTF)
Asylum Rejection and Removal Upheld Due to Lack of Credibility and Insufficient Political Persecution Claim
Cited to explain why the decision is final and not subject to appeal to the Federal Tribunal.
A/4193/2022 · ge (art. 8 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral, du 17 juin 2005 (LTF - RS 173.110))
Unemployment Benefits and Habitual Residence in Switzerland
Cited as the legal basis for forming a public law appeal against the current decision before the Federal Tribunal.
F-7251/2023 (Art. 8 Bst. c Ziff. 4 BGG)
Deportation upheld despite family ties claim
Cited to state that the judgment is final.
D-4601/2023 (Art. 8 Abs. 1 BGG)
Asylum Claim Rejected Under Dublin Regulation Due to Prior Bulgarian Application
This provision is cited to confirm that asylum matters are generally decided finally by the Federal Administrative Court.
D-3820/2023 (Art. 8 Abs. 83 Bst. d Ziff. 1 BGG)
Dublin Regulation Asylum Claim Rejected Due to Prior Croatian Application
This provision confirms that the Federal Administrative Court decides definitively in asylum matters.
C-3343/2021 (Art. 8 al. 2 LTF)
Disability Pension Termination Upheld Due to Improved Health and Work Capacity
Cited as a procedural rule for the lodging of appeals.
D-1312/2023 (Art. 8 lett. d cifra 1 LTF)
Asylum Seeker's Appeal Dismissed: German Responsibility for Claim Upheld
This provision determines the finality of the decision and limits the possibility of appeal to the Federal Tribunal.
A-2967/2021 (Art. 8 Abs. 1 Bst. b und Abs. 2 BGG)
Termination for Incapacity Due to Health Issues Upheld
These provisions were cited to explain the conditions under which decisions of the Federal Administrative Court in public-law employment matters can be appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
200 2022 455 · be (Art. 8 BGG)
Invalidity Benefits Appeal: Housekeeper's Orthopaedic and Cancer Claims
Cited in the legal instruction (Rechtsmittelbelehrung) as the relevant provision for filing an appeal in public law matters with the Federal Tribunal.
A-2768/2021 (Art. 8 Abs. 1 Bst. c BGG)
Federal Procurement Salary Equality Directive Challenge
Defines the eligibility to appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.