Art. 69 Bundesgesetz vom 17. Juni 2005 über das Bundesgericht (BGG) - Entscheide auf Geldleistung

RB240023 · zh (Art. 69 Abs. 2 BGG)

Dismissal of Appeal for Failure to Meet Formal Filing Requirements

Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the decision to waive costs (Order 2) is typically governed by procedural cost rules, which, in the absence of a specific citation for waiving costs in the dispositive itself, is omitted based on the strict rule to only include explicitly cited provisions in the final orders.

S 2023 20 · zg (Art. 69 Abs. 1 LTF)

Appeal Against Denial of Disability Benefits for Psychological Complaints

Cited in the reasoning regarding costs, although the explicit cost order refers to the waiver based on legal aid.

SB210066 · zh (Art. 69 Abs. 2 LTF)

Appeal Regarding Bookkeeping Conviction and Cross-Appeal for Breach of Trust

The specific article for legal aid (Entschädigung) is cited in the now final order 9.

A/2111/2022 · ge (Art. 69 al. 1 LTF)

Insurance Benefits Appeal for Pre-existing Knee Injury

Applied implicitly as the basis for the procedure being declared free of charge (procédure est gratuite).

ZKBES.2022.166 · so (Art. 69 Abs. 2 lit. b BGG)

Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing

This reference is implied in the text as the rule governing the appeal to the Federal Supreme Court when the value in dispute is below CHF 30'000, relevant context for the final disposition.

VSBES.2022.71 · so (Art. 69 LTF)

Appeal Against Discontinuation of Accident Insurance Benefits for CRPS

Implied by order 3, as the court rules that no court fees are charged in this case (consistent with Art. 69 LTF concerning court fees, though the specific cost order cited is implicit in the text 'Es werden keine Verfahrenskosten erhoben').

200 2021 371 · be (Art. 69 Abs. 1 LTF)

Beneficiary vs. Invalidity Office and Pension Fund Regarding Third-Party Payment Setoff

This provision is standardly cited for procedural grounds in decisions that explicitly dismiss an appeal, but it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive here, only Art. 69 Abs. 1bis IVG for costs.

BEZ.2022.42 · bs (Art. 69 Abs. 2 BGG)

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Cost Deposit

Although Art. 69 BGG is not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the court waives court costs, which generally relates to cost provisions like Art. 69 BGG (which governs court fees in Federal Supreme Court proceedings, though this is a cantonal decision waiving costs, the waiver itself is the relevant order).

BEZ.2022.44 · bs (Art. 69 Abs. 1 BGG)

Dismissal of Appeal Due to Failure to Post Security Deposit

This procedural rule for appealability is cited in the legal remedies section, but the court's action is based on Art. 101 Abs. 3 ZPO; however, as no other dispositive article relating to the main ground or procedure is cited, and since the court explicitly rules on costs (waiving them), I must check for cost articles cited in the dispositive. The waiver of costs is mentioned in the operative part: 'Es werden keine Gerichtskosten erhoben.' (No court costs are levied.) Since no specific provision for cost waiver is cited in the dispositive, I only include the provision establishing the non-admission.

IV.2021.00678 · zh (Art. 69 Abs. 1 BGG)

Appeal of Disability Pension Calculation and Third-Party Payment to Employer

This is mentioned in the reasoning but not in the final orders; therefore, it must be excluded.

CACIV.2022.18 · ne (Art. 69 al. 2 LTF)

Share Sale Conditional on Void Stock Management Agreement

Implied, as the appeal costs were allocated.

38.2022.30 · ti (Art. 69 al. 2 BGG)

Restitution of Undisclosed Commission-Based Unemployment Benefits

This rule is not cited in the dispositive orders 1, 2, or 3.

RU210114 · zh (Art. 2, Art. 4, Art. 68, Art. 69, Art. 70, Art. 72 ff. BGG)

Estate Dispute Dismissal Overturned Due to Improper Procedural Sanction

Cited in the final order section (Order 5) regarding the admissibility and form of a potential appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

RU210114 · zh (Art. 2, Art. 66, Art. 67, Art. 69 BGG)

Estate Dispute Dismissal Overturned Due to Improper Procedural Sanction

Cited in the reasoning as procedural rules concerning appeals to the Federal Supreme Court, relevant to the discussion of potential appealability but not explicitly in the operative part regarding costs.

C/2145/2020 · ge (art. 69 LTF)

Worker v. Company: Fixed-Term Employment and Collective Agreement Application

Cited in the reasoning as a provision governing the right to appeal to the Federal Tribunal.