Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
173.110 BGGLTF CH

Art. 4 Bundesgesetz vom 17. Juni 2005 über das Bundesgericht (BGG) - Sitz

BGG; 1. Kapitel: Stellung und Organisation
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (138 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 4 BGG · Sitz

Sitz des Bundesgerichts ist Lausanne.

Eine oder mehrere Abteilungen haben ihren Standort in Luzern.

← Art. 3 BGG Bundesgesetz vom 17. Juni 2005 über das Bundesgericht (BGG) - Oberste Recht sprechende Behörde Art. 5 BGG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (51)

200 2016 234 · be (Art. 4 BGG)
EU Citizen Employed Abroad by Swiss Confederation Entitled to Mandatory Swiss Social Security Coverage
Cited in the legal remedy section, although not used in the main dispositive orders.
A-3885/2023 (Art. 4 Abs. 1 BGG)
Federal Truck Stop Permit Overturned for Procedural Flaws
Cited to indicate the deadline for filing an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
ARMP.2025.74 · ne (Art. 4 Statut ARMP (Implicit via context: 'Art. 93 LTF' equivalent for this authority))
Prosecutor's Inaction on Theft Complaints Subject to Mooted Delay Claim
While not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the authority's general framework (analogous to procedural rules for admissibility/review) guides the decision on the substance of the appeal, though the actual dispositive relies on the outcome of the issues examined (which are procedural/substantive grounds).
BO.2024.34.K3 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 2 BGG)
Procedural Costs Allocation After Partial Success and Overturned Precedent
Not explicitly cited in the final orders (Dispositiv).
UV.2024.00014 · zh (Art. 4 BGG)
Insurance Denial Appeal for Jogging Knee Injury Affirmed
Cited in order 4 to establish the procedural rules for filing an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court (though the provision itself is not the main ground for the cantonal court's decision).
PS230196 · zh (Art. 4 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG)
Debtor's Appeal Against Bankruptcy Dismissed Due to Insufficient Solvency Proof
This article regarding costs is not explicitly cited in the dispositive section (numbered orders 1-8).
UV.2023.00098 · zh (Art. 4 BGG)
Work Accident Disability Benefits Appeal Dismissed Due to Pre-Existing Condition Finding
Cited in the dispositive to establish the applicable procedural framework for appealing to the Federal Supreme Court.
P/2948/2023 · ge (art. 4 LTF)
Tachograph Violation Appeal: Improper Service of Summons
This article (implicitly cited via the reference to Art. 78 LTF in the final paragraph) is included because the final order admits the appeal, which then leads to the disposition ruling on costs, implying the procedural framework of the Federal Supreme Court's review criteria, although the actual operative part refers to Cantonal procedural rules for the decision itself.
UV.2022.00036 · zh (Art. 4 BGG)
Knee Injury: Traumatic vs. Degenerative Cause
Cited in relation to the time limits for submitting an appeal to the Federal Court.
RU210114 · zh (Art. 2, Art. 4, Art. 68, Art. 69, Art. 70, Art. 72 ff. BGG)
Estate Dispute Dismissal Overturned Due to Improper Procedural Sanction
Cited in the final order section (Order 5) regarding the admissibility and form of a potential appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
III 2021 32 · sz (Art. 4 und 82ff. des Bundesgesetzes über das Bundesgericht [BGG; SR 173.110] vom 17.6.2005)
Owners v. Municipal Council (Rezoning Initiative Admissibility)
Cited in the dispositive for the possibility to file an appeal in public law matters to the Federal Supreme Court.
A-6933/2017 (Art. 4 LTF)
Expropriation Indemnity for Railway Project Land Use
Cited in relation to the payment of procedural costs fixed by the Federal Administrative Court.
E-1765/2020 (Art. 4 BGG)
Asylum Claim Rejection and Deportation Upheld Due to Lack of Credibility
Used to define the scope of Federal Administrative Court's jurisdiction.
III 2019 238 · sz (Art. 4. Gegen diesen Entscheid kann innert 30 Tagen seit Zustellung Beschwerde* in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenheiten beim Bundesgericht, 1000 Lausanne 14, erhoben werden, soweit sich eine Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung stellt (Art. 42 und 82ff., insbesondere Art. 85 des Bundesgesetzes über das Bundesgericht [BGG; SR 173.110] vom 17.6.2005).)
Petitioner's Claim for State Liability Compensation Following Acquittal Dismissed
Provision detailing the appeal route to the Federal Supreme Court (BGG articles cited).
A/1823/2019 · ge (Art. 4 LTF)
Disability Benefits Appeal Remanded for Mixed Status Determination Based on Health-Related Work Incapacity
Not cited in the dispositive.