173.110
BGGLTF
CH
CH
Art. 33 Bundesgesetz vom 17. Juni 2005 über das Bundesgericht (BGG) - Disziplin
BGG; 2. Kapitel: Allgemeine Verfahrensbestimmungen
Art. 33 BGG · Disziplin
Wer im Verfahren vor dem Bundesgericht den Anstand verletzt oder den Geschäftsgang stört, wird mit einem Verweis oder einer Ordnungsbusse bis zu 1000 Franken bestraft.
Im Falle böswilliger oder mutwilliger Prozessführung können die Partei und ihr Vertreter oder ihre Vertreterin mit einer Ordnungsbusse bis zu 2000 Franken und bei Wiederholung bis zu 5000 Franken bestraft werden.
Der oder die Vorsitzende einer Verhandlung kann Personen, die seine oder ihre Anweisungen nicht befolgen, aus dem Sitzungssaal wegweisen und mit einer Ordnungsbusse bis zu 1000 Franken bestrafen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (39)
5F_46/2025 (Art. 33 al. 2 LTF)
Revision request against inadmissibility ruling in debt enforcement dispute for lack of a valid revision ground under Articles 121 ff. of the Federal Supreme Court Act, with disciplinary fine for abusive litigation.
Basis for imposing a disciplinary fine on the requester for abusive litigation tactics.
5F_41/2026 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 BGG)
Revision of final federal judgment in divorce recusal dispute—revision inadmissible for re-litigating factual findings and legal merits.
Imposed a fine on the petitioner for querulant and abusive litigation conduct.
5F_43/2026 (Art. 33 al. 2 BGG)
Revision against dismissal of prior revision for lack of stated statutory ground, abused as querulous litigation and penalized with fine
Imposed a fine of CHF 2,000 for abusive, querulous litigation conduct.
E-532/2026 (Art. 33 BGG)
Asylum Applicant's Credibility Issues Lead to Removal Order
Confirms the finality of decisions made by the Federal Administrative Court in asylum matters.
D-7669/2025 (Art. 33 LTF)
Mother and Daughter Asylum Appeal Dismissed Due to Unexhausted Domestic Remedies
Lists the authorities whose decisions can be appealed to the Federal Administrative Court.
E-6395/2025 (Art. 33 BGG)
Angolan Asylum Denial Upheld Due to Lack of Credibility
Cited as part of the procedural framework for appeals to the Federal Administrative Court in asylum matters.
BB.2024.93 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 BGG)
Federal Court Upholds Prosecutor's Decision to Dismiss Criminal Complaint Against Judges
Mentioned in the factual background as the basis for imposing a fine for wilful procedural misconduct, though not explicitly in the final orders.
D-6763/2023 (Art. 31-33 BGG)
Asylum Denial and Deportation Order Upheld Despite Persecution Claim
Cited regarding the final jurisdiction of the Federal Administrative Court in asylum matters.
B-1858/2022 (Art. 33 Bst. d BGG)
Sole Proprietorship Ordered to Repay Short-Time Work Compensation Due to Non-Cooperation with Audit
Cited for the jurisdiction of the Federal Administrative Court.
E-228/2023 (Art. 33 BGG)
Dublin Regulation upheld: Asylum seeker to be deported to Germany.
This provision is mentioned in the context of the court's final jurisdiction in asylum matters.
8C_14/2022 (Art. 33 Abs. 1 BGG)
Social welfare appeal dismissed for unpaid cost advance after extended deadline; disciplinary fine for improper conduct
Imposed a disciplinary fine for continued violation of proper conduct.
B-4654/2021 (art. 33 let. d LTF)
Procedural Irregularities Void Professional Examination, New Exam Ordered.
Cited to establish the Federal Administrative Court's jurisdiction.
B-2597/2020 (art. 33 let. e LTF)
Cancellation of Swiss Trademarks for Watches and Watch Parts
Used to establish the jurisdiction of the Federal Administrative Court in specific types of cases.
U 2020 6 · gr (Art. 33 BGG)
Association Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Defects and Unprofessional Conduct
Cited in the reasoning as case law reference regarding the violation of decorum (though not explicitly listed in the dispositive, it supports the reasoning for the reprimand under Art. 18 Abs. 2 VRG).
BK 2019 414 · be (Art. 33 BGG)
Juvenile Biometric Data Collection Order Appeal Dismissed on Procedural Grounds
This article concerns costs for the Federal Tribunal, not the cantonal instance.