172.021
VWVGPA
CH
CH
Art. 9 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Dezember 1968 über das Verwaltungsverfahren (VwVG)
VwVG; Zweiter Abschnitt: Allgemeine Verfahrensgrundsätze; A. Zuständigkeit; III. Streitigkeiten
Art. 9 VwVG
Die Behörde, die sich als zuständig erachtet, stellt dies durch Verfügung fest, wenn eine Partei die Zuständigkeit bestreitet.
Die Behörde, die sich als unzuständig erachtet, tritt durch Verfügung auf die Sache nicht ein, wenn eine Partei die Zuständigkeit behauptet.
Kompetenzkonflikte zwischen Behörden, ausgenommen Kompetenzkonflikte mit dem Bundesgericht, dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht oder mit kantonalen Behörden, beurteilt die gemeinsame Aufsichtsbehörde oder, wenn eine solche fehlt, der Bundesrat.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (142)
JAAC 68.33 (Art. 9 VwVG)
Cantonal Tariff Extension Partially Invalidated Over Improper Direct Billing System
This article is referenced in the context of the Federal Council's review powers, stating that the Federal Council has full jurisdiction in factual and legal matters when a cantonal lower instance has ruled. However, the court notes that it may refrain from reviewing a tariff for appropriateness and legality if necessary to enforce the statutory system of tariff formation.
JAAC 65.73 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 VwVG)
Jurisdiction over Provisional Admission Appeals
This provision is cited for the principle that the appeal commission does not have jurisdiction and therefore will not enter into the merits of the appeal.
A-365/2026 (Art. 9 al. 2 PA)
Tax Authority's VAT Assessment on Employee Benefits Remitted for Further Investigation
Cited in relation to the consequence of the appeal being declared inadmissible and the case being transmitted to the lower authority, implying the court's procedural competence for this transmission.
E-1694/2026 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 VwVG)
Asylum seeker's claims predated prior decision, second application invalid
Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for the SEM's decision not to enter into the application due to lack of functional jurisdiction, which the court upholds.
D-1194/2026 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 VwVG)
Court Upholds Refusal of Repeated Asylum Application and Removal Order
Used by the SEM to decline jurisdiction for parts of the application that should have been submitted as a revision request.
D-471/2026 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 VwVG)
State Secretariat for Migration v. Reconsideration Request on Pre-Existing Facts
Cited for the SEM's decision not to consider the request because it lacked functional jurisdiction.
D-9833/2025 (Art. 9 al. 2 PA)
Federal Administrative Court Upholds SEM's Rejection of Asylum Revision Request
Cited by the SEM to justify not entering into the merits of the new asylum application, considering it a request for revision. The Federal Administrative Court upheld this reasoning.
D-9703/2025 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 VwVG)
Asylum reconsideration request dismissed due to untimely evidence.
Cited in the dispositive as a ground for the SEM's justified non-admission of the request for reconsideration due to lack of functional competence.
D-9412/2025 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 VwVG)
Asylum Appeal Denied, Deportation Order Upheld Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Merits
Applied to compel the SEM to rule on its jurisdiction, as the parties insisted on having their case heard by the SEM despite the court's assessment of its lack of jurisdiction.
D-5850/2025 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 VwVG)
Federal Office for Migration Jurisdiction in Asylum Appeals
The court used this provision to uphold the SEM's decision not to enter into the merits of the case due to a lack of functional jurisdiction.
D-5854/2025 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 VwVG)
Federal Administrative Court Upholds Rejection of New Asylum Application Due to Procedural Grounds
Cited as the legal basis for the SEM's decision not to enter into the applicant's submission due to lack of functional jurisdiction.
A-5669/2024 (Art. 9 al. 2 PA)
Federal Administrative Court: Internal Appeal Required for Medical Reassessment
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because the use of the 'recours sautant' was contrary to the prohibition of abuse of rights.
Bundesrat · 2025-10-08-beschwerde-eda (Art. 9 al. 2 PA)
NGO Funding Suspension and Reputation Damage Case
Specifies that an authority deeming itself incompetent issues a decision of inadmissibility if a party claims it has jurisdiction.
D-4811/2025 (Art. 9 al. 2 PA)
Asylum seeker's new claim rejected due to lack of new evidence
Cited as the legal basis for the SEM's decision not to consider the applicant's request.
E-5399/2025 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 VwVG)
Asylum Appeal Dismissed Over Insufficient New Evidence
Cited as the basis for the SEM's decision not to enter into the applicants' claims regarding Turkish airstrikes and armed conflicts due to lack of functional jurisdiction.