172.021
VWVGPA
CH
CH
Art. 35 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Dezember 1968 über das Verwaltungsverfahren (VwVG)
VwVG; Zweiter Abschnitt: Allgemeine Verfahrensgrundsätze; J. Eröffnung; I. Schriftlichkeit; 2. Begründung und Rechtsmittelbelehrung
Art. 35 VwVG
Schriftliche Verfügungen sind, auch wenn die Behörde sie in Briefform eröffnet, als solche zu bezeichnen, zu begründen und mit einer Rechtsmittelbelehrung zu versehen.
Die Rechtsmittelbelehrung muss das zulässige ordentliche Rechtsmittel, die Rechtsmittelinstanz und die Rechtsmittelfrist nennen.
Die Behörde kann auf Begründung und Rechtsmittelbelehrung verzichten, wenn sie den Begehren der Parteien voll entspricht und keine Partei eine Begründung verlangt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (790)
C-3705/2013 (art. 35 al. 1 PA)
Cantonal Tariff Invalidated for Violation of Right to be Heard
Cited for the right to receive a reasoned decision.
JAAC 70.49 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 VwVG)
Asylum Seeker's Deportation Reconsideration Due to Insufficient Risk Assessment
Cited as the legal basis for the obligation to provide written reasons for administrative decisions, which was found to be violated in the dispositive.
JAAC 69.50 (Art. 35 al. 1 PA)
Asylum seekers' trauma-related statements must be addressed by authorities.
The court cited this provision concerning the obligation of the authority to state the reasons for its decision.
JAAC 64.43 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 VwVG)
Film Production Subsidy Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Development
This provision establishes the right to a reasoned decision, which the court assessed in relation to the justification provided for rejecting the film project.
E-4870/2023 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 VwVG)
Russian National's Asylum Claim Rejected Due to Insufficient Fear of Persecution
Cited as a basis for the duty to provide reasons, which was found not to have been violated.
F-3374/2026 (art. 35 PA)
Asylum Case of French Minor: Right to be Heard and Procedural Errors
Cited for the obligation to state reasons.
F-1867/2026 (Art. 35 VwVG)
Asylum Seekers' Right to be Heard in Canton Assignment
Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for the violation of the right to be heard.
E-4492/2025 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 VwVG)
Ukrainian Nationals' Protection Status Upheld in Poland
This provision concerns the duty to provide reasons for decisions, and the court found that the SEM's decision was sufficiently reasoned.
F-7920/2024 (Art. 35 VwVG)
Entry Ban Overturned Due to Insufficient Consideration of Family Interests
Cited as the basis for the finding that the reasoning of the appealed decision was insufficient.
D-980/2026 (Art. 35 Abs. 2 VwVG)
SEM's Incorrect Appeal Notice Invalidates Asylum Decision
Cited as the legal basis for the requirement that a notification of appeal must be complete and correct, which was not met in this case.
F-1103/2024 (art. 35 PA)
Mother and Children v. Migration Authority: Residence Permit Appeal
Cited in conjunction with the right to be heard and the duty of motivation, which was not met by the lower authority.
A-536/2025 (Art. 35 VwVG)
Employee Termination Upheld Despite Disability Claim and Right to Be Heard Arguments
Cited as the legal basis for the duty to provide reasons for a decision.
E-1566/2025 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 VwVG)
Ukrainian Seeking Protection in Switzerland Denied Due to Polish Status
Cited as the legal basis requiring decisions to be reasoned.
F-3652/2025 (Art. 35 PA)
Refugee's Right to Choose Residence Upheld
Ensures the right to be heard in administrative procedures.
E-7354/2025 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 VwVG)
Asylum Seeker's Date of Birth Dispute: Court Upholds State's Assessment
Cited by the Federal Court in the previous instance for the insufficient reasoning of the earlier decision, leading to its annulment and remittance.