Art. 32 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Dezember 1968 über das Verwaltungsverfahren (VwVG)

BVGE-2020-VI-6 (Art. 32 al. 2 PA)

Family Asylum: Duty to Cooperate and Breach of Trust

Mentioned in relation to the possibility for authorities to consider late allegations if they appear decisive.

C-3175/2013 (Art. 32 al. 2 PA)

Ambulatory Medical Services Tariff Dispute

This article allows for the consideration of late submissions, justifying the inclusion of the private clinic's statement.

JAAC 69.50 (Art. 32 al. 1 PA)

Asylum seekers' trauma-related statements must be addressed by authorities.

The court cited this provision regarding the obligation of the authority to consider all relevant submissions from the parties.

JAAC 68.148 (Art. 32 al. 2 et art. 57 al. 1 PA)

Inclusion of Arrest Warrant Key to Asylum Claim Reconsideration

These provisions are implicitly referenced in the dispositive's reasoning regarding the consideration of a late submission by the first-instance authority, and the general obligation for authorities to establish the facts of the case.

JAAC 65.75 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 VwVG)

Asylum Seeker's Right to Be Heard and Procedural Fairness

Allows for the consideration of late submissions before the final decision if they appear decisive.

VPB 3128-2000-1246 (Art. 32 PA)

Trademark Opposition: Protection Refused in Switzerland

This article is cited in the dispositive to order the defendant to pay costs to the opponent.

E-3450/2020 (Art. 32 VwVG)

*Re-evaluation of Asylum Claims Due to Evolving Iranian Situation*

Cited to explain that the provision on fact-finding is primarily tailored to administrative proceedings before first-instance federal authorities, not appellate proceedings.

B-1094/2026 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 VwVG)

Trademark Opposition Closure Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Failure

Mentioned as the provision under which the authority considers late submissions if they are decisive.

E-5852/2020 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 VwVG)

Family's Asylum Case Remanded for Further Review on Political Persecution Claims

Provision on the court's obligation to consider new facts and evidence submitted during the appeal process.

E-458/2024 (Art. 32 VwVG)

Asylum Appeals Consolidated: Iran Situation Volatility Mandates Reassessment of Removal Orders

Cited in the reasoning regarding the court's role in fact-finding versus the primary authority's role.

D-1416/2023 (Art. 32 VwVG)

Iranian Asylum Seekers' Case Remanded Due to Changed Circumstances and Procedural Errors

Cited regarding the determination of facts, primarily applicable to initial administrative proceedings.

D-5882/2020 (Art. 32 VwVG)

Asylum Reconsideration Due to Changed Country Conditions and Acquired Residence Permit

Governs the establishment of facts in administrative proceedings, primarily for the first instance.

D-2591/2024 (Art. 32 VwVG)

Asylum Appeal Quashed and Remitted for Reassessment Due to Changed Country Conditions

Cited to clarify the scope of fact-finding in appellate proceedings.

D-4845/2025 (Art. 32 VwVG)

Federal Administrative Court Reopens Asylum Case Due to Changed Conditions in Iran

Cited as a provision concerning the determination of facts, primarily applicable to proceedings before first-instance federal authorities.

RR.2026.56 (Art. 32 PA)

Extradition to Italy for Assault Upheld Despite Prison Concerns

Used to reject belated arguments that were not decisive for the outcome of the appeal.