170.32
VGLRCFLResp
CH
CH
Art. 22 Bundesgesetz vom 14. März 1958 über die Verantwortlichkeit des Bundes sowie seiner Behördemitglieder und Beamten (VG)
VG; VI. Abschnitt: Verjährung und Verwirkung
Art. 22 VG
Die Verjährung der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung richtet sich nach den Bestimmungen des Strafrechts.
Die disziplinarische Verantwortlichkeit eines Beamten verjährt nach den speziellen Disziplinarbestimmungen, jedoch längstens ein Jahr nach Entdeckung des disziplinwidrigen Verhaltens, auf alle Fälle drei Jahre nach der letzten Verletzung der Dienstpflicht.
Die Verjährung ruht, solange wegen des nämlichen Tatbestandes ein Strafverfahren durchgeführt wird oder solange über Rechtsmittel noch nicht entschieden ist, die im Disziplinarverfahren ergriffen wurden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (10)
601 2020 30 · fr (Art. 22 LResp)
Employee Liability Claim Barred by Finality of Prior Administrative Rulings
The court confirmed the decision based on this article, which prevents reviewing the legality of a decision that has acquired final legal force in a liability procedure.
12.2015.104 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Statute of Limitations and Mandatory Conciliation in Damages Claim Against Public Entity
This article, which refers to the Code of Civil Procedure for litigation against public entities, was central to the debate regarding the required procedural steps (conciliation vs. direct petition).
34.2012.36 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Occupational Pension Overpayment Dispute Transferred from Social Security Court
Cited regarding the transmission of the case to the competent authority.
12.2003.58 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Journalist's Claim Against Canton for Undue Use of Intercepts and Magistrate's Abstention
The court found sufficient grounds for mandatory abstention based on this article, even if not strictly covered by procedural rules.
53.1999.1 · ti (Art. 22 LResp)
Municipality v. Police Agent for Property Damage from Traffic Violation
Cited in the final ruling section as providing the jurisdictional basis for the Administrative Cantonal Tribunal.
53.1995.9 · ti (art. 22 LResp)
Municipality v. Former Tax Head: Gross Negligence in Tax Claim Submission
Cited as the basis for the Administrative Court's jurisdiction to decide on the liability action.
12.2003.58 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Claimant v. Canton: Recusal of Presiding Judge Based on Conflict of Interest with Council of Magistracy
The Tribunal concluded that there were sufficient grounds, not provided for in procedural rules, for the mandatory abstention of the ordinary civil judge based on this article.
12.2003.9 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Judge Recusal Due to Membership in Challenged Judicial Council
Cited in the reasoning but is NOT explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1-3).
12.2003.9 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 3 LResp)
Judge Recusal Due to Membership in Challenged Judicial Council
Cited in the reasoning but is NOT explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1-3).
34.2012.36 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Insured's Claim for Legal Fees Against Pension Fund Not Within Cantonal Insurance Court Jurisdiction
Cited as part of the legal basis for the transmission of the case due to incompetence.