170.32
VGLRCFLResp
CH
CH
Art. 11 Bundesgesetz vom 14. März 1958 über die Verantwortlichkeit des Bundes sowie seiner Behördemitglieder und Beamten (VG)
VG; II. Abschnitt: Die Haftung für Schaden
Art. 11 VG
Soweit der Bund als Subjekt des Zivilrechts auftritt, haftet er nach dessen Bestimmungen.
Auch in diesen Fällen steht dem Geschädigten kein Anspruch gegenüber dem fehlbaren Beamten zu.
Der Rückgriff des Bundes richtet sich nach den Artikeln 7 und 9.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (36)
VWKLA.2023.1 · so (§ 11 Abs. 1 Verantwortlichkeitsgesetz (VG, BGS 124.21))
Cemetery Maintenance Company v. Municipality Over Grave Clearance
This provision served as the original basis for the plaintiff's claim, although the claim was ultimately dismissed.
CDP.2020.113 · ne (Art. 11 LResp)
Applicants v. State: Failure to Detain Based on Warning
Cited in the reasoning to establish the procedure for submitting the indemnity claim to the relevant State Department.
VWKLA.2020.2 · so (§ 11 Abs. 2 VG)
Claimant vs. Canton Regarding Judicial Decision Review
This provision regulates the submission of the claim to the administrative court after the department's response, which is part of the procedural context.
CDP.2014.213 · ne (Art. 11 LResp)
Patient v. Public Hospital (Lost Denture Liability)
Cited in relation to the deadlines for presenting a compensation claim.
CACIV.2015.47 · ne (Art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Patient v. Public Hospital Regarding Timeliness of Administrative Claim Following Childbirth Complications
The lower court incorrectly applied this provision to dismiss the action as time-barred.
CACIV.2015.47 · ne (Art. 11 al. 3 LResp)
Patient v. Public Hospital Regarding Timeliness of Administrative Claim Following Childbirth Complications
The appeal was admitted because the lower court erred in not applying this provision, as the public entity had entered into discussions/settlement talks.
CDP.2013.196 · ne (Art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Public Contract Award Dispute and Preclusion Period Compliance
The court confirmed the admissibility of the administrative action based on the timely filing within the six-month period stipulated by this provision, taking into account the conciliation filing date.
CDP.2013.196 · ne (Art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Public Contract Award Dispute and Preclusion Period Compliance
The court used this provision to determine the deadline for filing the action after the indemnity request was contested or left without response.
CDP.2013.196 · ne (Art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Public Contract Award Dispute and Preclusion Period Compliance
This article was used to establish that the filing before the Regional Court occurred within the six-month deadline.
CDP.2015.316 · ne (art. 11 al. 1 let. a [LResp])
Officer Termination Annulled for Procedural Due Process Violations; Damages Claim Remitted.
Cited as the basis for declining jurisdiction over the moral damages claim and transferring it to the competent department.
CDP.2015.316 · ne (art. 11 al. 2 [LResp])
Officer Termination Annulled for Procedural Due Process Violations; Damages Claim Remitted.
Cited in relation to the procedural deadlines for pursuing the damages claim after departmental inaction.
CDP.2006.426 · ne (art. 11 al. 1 let. b LResp)
Wrongful Termination Appeal Receivable; Mobbing and Certificate Claims Inadmissible in Administrative Action
Cited as the basis for transmitting the claim for moral damages to the defendant (Hôpital neuchâtelois) as the competent authority.
CDP.2015.131 · ne (art. 11 al. 1 let. b [LResp])
Lifeguard Dismissal Overturned Due to Procedural Delay
Cited in the reasoning regarding the prerequisite claim for moral damages that must be addressed to the communal council.
CDP.2015.131 · ne (art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Lifeguard Dismissal Overturned Due to Procedural Delay
Cited in the reasoning regarding the deadline for pursuing the action if the council contests the claim for moral damages.
CACIV.2015.5 · ne (art. 11 LResp)
Patient v. Hospital: Commencement of Limitation Period for Medical Malpractice Claim Following Appendectomy Complications
Cited in the reasoning of the first instance decision (F) to establish the admissibility of the action within the six-month deadline, and discussed extensively in the appeal reasoning.