170.32
VGLRCFLResp
CH
CH
Art. 10 Bundesgesetz vom 14. März 1958 über die Verantwortlichkeit des Bundes sowie seiner Behördemitglieder und Beamten (VG)
VG; II. Abschnitt: Die Haftung für Schaden
Art. 10 VG
Über streitige Ansprüche des Bundes oder gegen den Bund erlässt die zuständige Behörde eine Verfügung. Das Beschwerdeverfahren richtet sich nach den allgemeinen Bestimmungen über die Bundesrechtspflege.
Über streitige Ansprüche auf Schadenersatz und Genugtuung aus der Amtstätigkeit von Personen im Sinne von Artikel 1 Absatz 1 Buchstaben a–c bis urteilt das Bundesgericht als einzige Instanz im Sinne von Artikel 120 des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes vom 17. Juni 2005 . Die Klage gegen den Bund kann beim Bundesgericht erhoben werden, wenn die zuständige Behörde zum Anspruch innert dreier Monate seit seiner Geltendmachung nicht oder ablehnend Stellung genommen hat.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (30)
A-1025/2023 (Art. 10 al. 1, 2ème phrase, LRCF)
EPFL Pension Contribution Dispute and Interest Calculation
Indicates that general federal procedural provisions govern the appeal procedure.
CDP.2020.113 · ne (Art. 10 LResp)
Applicants v. State: Failure to Detain Based on Warning
Cited in the reasoning to establish the prescription period for the indemnity claim.
A-3974/2020 (Art. 10 Abs. 1 VG)
Educational Institution's Duty of Care Claims Competency
Specifies that the EFD decides on disputed claims against the Confederation.
A-5605/2017 (Art. 10 Abs. 1 VG)
Claimant's Delay Claim Dismissed as Moot and Unfounded
Designates the competent authority for assessing damage and satisfaction claims.
A-5605/2017 (Art. 10 Abs. 2 VG)
Claimant's Delay Claim Dismissed as Moot and Unfounded
Regulates claims for damages and satisfaction against the Confederation and specifies the competence of the Federal Court in certain cases.
CDP.2014.213 · ne (Art. 10 LResp)
Patient v. Public Hospital (Lost Denture Liability)
Cited in relation to the deadlines for presenting a compensation claim.
CACIV.2015.47 · ne (Art. 10 LResp)
Patient v. Public Hospital Regarding Timeliness of Administrative Claim Following Childbirth Complications
Mentioned in the reasoning as not being the issue in dispute (the one-year limitation period).
CDP.2013.196 · ne (Art. 10 LResp)
Public Contract Award Dispute and Preclusion Period Compliance
The court confirmed that the prerequisite for the action, the prior filing of an indemnity request, was met pursuant to this article.
CDP.2011.292 · ne (Art. 10 LResp)
Hospital Liability for Medical Negligence and Prescription Period for Damages
The court used this article to determine that the request for compensation was filed within the one-year limitation period, as the clock started running on November 26, 2010.
A-1053/2014 (Art. 10 Abs. 1 VG)
Employee's Resignation Claim Time-Barred
The appeal procedure in state liability matters is governed by the general provisions on federal legal protection.
CDP.2004.87 · ne (Art. 10 LResp)
Claimant v. Canton: Alleged Malpractice in Neuroleptic Prescription
This article governed the required deadlines for presenting the claim, which the court found the claimant had respected.
CDP.2013.229 · ne (Art. 10 LResp)
Employee v. State Regarding Disability Reporting Failure
This article, concerning the limitation period for claims, was cited in the reasoning establishing that the formal conditions for bringing the action were met, but it did not appear in the dispositive.
A-5119/2013 (Art. 10 Abs. 1 VG)
Federal Department of Finance v. Claimant (Statute of Limitations)
Establishes that procedural rules for state liability follow general federal jurisdiction rules, confirming the administrative court's jurisdiction.
CDP.2009.275 · ne (Art. 10 LResp)
Student Injury During Self-Refereed Unihockey Match Against State
The grounds for the final rejection of the claim are discussed under the premise of the LResp, although not explicitly cited in order 1.
A-3109/2011 (Art. 10 Abs. 1 VG)
Pension Fund vs. Government: Supervisory Duty Claim Upheld
Cited in the context of the EFD's offer to process the claims according to the procedures outlined in the Responsibility Act.