Art. 65 Verfassung des Kantons Bern, (KV)

B.2023.84 · sg (Art. 65 lit. c KV)

Reduction of Education Subsidies Based on Program Intensity

Cited in the reasoning section supporting the interpretation of the purpose of educational grants (not the final order).

60/2021/41/und/60/20 · sh (Art. 65 Abs. 2 KV)

Cantonal Primary School Mask Mandate Appeal Dismissed

Cited in context of the better legal form (Ordinance) that could have been used by the Government Council.

60/2015/31 · sh (Art. 65 Abs. 1 KV)

Labor Office Fine Competence over Posting of Workers Act Violations

This provision was cited in conjunction with Art. 67 lit. e KV as the basis for the Cantonal Government to transfer decision-making powers via ordinance.

AN.2018.00001 · zh (Art. 65 Abs. 4 KV)

Cantonal Council Ordinance Amendment Standing Challenge Dismissed

This provision is listed among the legal norms cited in the context of the final decision, which dismissed the appeal by refusing to enter a decision on the merits.

B.2015.162 · sg (Art. 65 lit. c KV)

Denial of Master's Scholarship Upheld Due to Exceeded Maximum Educational Duration

This article concerning cantonal constitutional law was mentioned in the background discussion and is not directly applied in the dispositive orders.

B.2015.162 · sg (Art. 65 lit. c KV)

Scholarship Denial Based on Exceeded Maximum Educational Duration

Mentioned in the preamble, but not used in the dispositive orders.

AbR.1990.91.Nr.31 · ow (Art. 65 Abs. 2 KV)

Electricity Provider's Lien Invalidated Due to Lack of Legal Basis

Cited to determine that establishing legal pledges requires a formal law, not merely a regulation, due to its significant impact on property rights.

B.2012.229 · sg (Art. 65 lit. l KV)

Inadmissibility of Cantonal Initiative for Federal Advocacy

Cited in the reasoning to establish that only the Cantonal Council can request a federal initiative, which supports the finding of inadmissibility of the second part of the popular initiative.

B.2012.229 · sg (Art. 65 lit. l KV)

Cantonal Initiative for Federal Animal Product Ban Inadmissible Due to Lack of Feasibility

This provision was cited to establish that only the Cantonal Council (Kantonsrat) is authorized to submit a Standesinitiative (delegation initiative), which the unified initiative was deemed to be seeking.

AN.2018.00001 · zh (Art. 65 Abs. 4 KV)

Appeal on Standing to Challenge Cantonal Ordinance Amendment

This provision appears to be cited in connection with the overall review, although the summary focuses on admissibility.