Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
131.212 KV CH

Art. 2 Verfassung des Kantons Bern, (KV)

KV; 1 Allgemeine Grundsätze; Verhältnis zum Bund und zu den anderen Kantonen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (144 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 2 KV

Der Kanton Bern ist ein Stand der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft.

Er arbeitet mit dem Bund und den anderen Kantonen zusammen und versteht sich als Mittler zwischen der deutschsprachigen und der französischsprachigen Schweiz.

← Art. 1 KV Verfassung des Kantons Bern, (KV) Art. 3 KV →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (28)

WBE.2023.286 · ag (§ 2 KV)
Citizenship applicant's minor, resolved debts do not disqualify her.
This provision, concerning the principle of proportionality, was cited in relation to the unconstitutionality of § 9 Abs. 5 KBüG.
B.2021.213 · sg (Art. 2 Abs. 1 lit. b KV)
COVID-19 Indemnity Appeal Dismissed Over Exclusion Criteria
Mentioned in the reasoning context regarding the prohibition of arbitrary action and equality principles applied to the case.
B.2021.213 · sg (Art. 2 Abs. 1 lit. b KV)
Appeal Against Denial of COVID-19 Income Loss Compensation Upheld Despite Hospital-Specific Factor Omission
Cited in reasoning as a background constitutional provision relevant to the principle of equal treatment, which the applicant invoked.
AN.2020.00003 · zh (Art. 2 Abs. 1 KV)
Cantonal Council Compensation Regulation Challenge
This article is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' but is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders. It is excluded based on the rules.
B.2018.97.vorher.B · sg (Art. 2 lit. m KV)
Unvaccinated Student Exclusion Upheld Due to Measles Exposure Urgency
Referenced in connection with the fundamental right to basic education.
B.2018.97.vorher.B · sg (Art. 2 lit. m KV)
Unvaccinated Child Measles Exposure School Exclusion Appeal
Cited in the reasoning in relation to the right to sufficient and free primary education.
JSD 2018 3 · lu (§ 2 Abs. 1 KV)
Council Member v. Municipality: Revocation of Departmental Duties Lacks Legal Basis
Cited as a general principle that state action must be in the public interest and proportionate, relevant to the legal basis requirement for the measure.
JSD 2018 3 · lu (§ 2 Abs. 2 KV)
Council Member v. Municipality: Revocation of Departmental Duties Lacks Legal Basis
Cited as a general principle that state action must be proportionate, relevant to the legal basis requirement for the measure.
V 2017 1 · gr (Art. 2 der Verfassung des Kantons Graubünden (KV/GR; BR 110.100))
Challenger Appeal of Municipal Contribution to Olympic Campaign Dismissed for Procedural and Standing Defects
Not explicitly cited in the dispositive.
B.2016.147 · sg (Art. 2 Ingress und lit. e KV)
Teacher Physical Misconduct Professional Ban Upheld
Cited as part of the constitutional basis for protecting the integrity of children and young people, justifying the professional ban.
B.2016.19 · sg (Art. 2 lit. f KV)
Asylum Seeker Reassignment for Emergency Assistance Upheld
The court addresses the appellant's claims regarding the right to aid in distress under cantonal law in the reasoning leading to the final decision to dismiss the appeal.
B.2016.121 · sg (Art. 2 Ingress und lit. m der Kantonsverfassung (sGS 111.1, KV))
School Attendance Location Dispute Based on Commute Reasonableness
Cited as the Cantonal constitutional repetition of the right to sufficient primary education.
B.2016.121 · sg (Art. 2 Ingress und lit. m der Kantonsverfassung (sGS 111.1, KV))
Student Residence Versus School District Attendance Dispute
Cited in the reasoning as reiterating the right to sufficient primary education.
7H 13 42 · lu (§ 2 Abs. 2 KV)
Challenge to Sewage Surcharge Based on Slaughter Counts and Undetermined Calculation Criteria
Mentioned in the list of cited articles, though the reasoning refers to § 2 Abs. 1 KV regarding the principle of legality, not Abs. 2.
K.2012.5 · sg (Art. 2 Abs. 1 lit. b KV)
State Employees Loyalty Bonus Equal Treatment Case
The court found that the transitional regulation violated the principle of equality enshrined in this article.