Art. 14 Verfassung des Kantons Bern, (KV)

VVGE.1966.70.Nr.58 · ow (Art. 14 KV)

Eminent Domain for Sidewalk Construction Upheld

States that the existence of public interest is a material prerequisite for expropriation.

VVGE.2011.13.Nr.26 · ow (Art. 14 Abs. 2 KV)

Municipality Granted Expropriation Rights for Property Access Improvement

This provision is cited to confirm that the deprivation of property requires a legal basis and a public interest.

VB.2007.00361 · zh (Art. 14 KV)

Failure to Pass Licentiate Exams and Academic Dismissal Upheld

Cited in the relevant legal norms section, suggesting consideration in the substantive ruling regarding the Cantonal Constitution.

VD.2017.109 · bs (§ 14 KV)

Police Officers v. Administrative Decision on Service Vehicle Entitlement

Cited in reasoning to dismiss the claim that it grants an individual right to a personally assigned, privately usable service vehicle.

V 2016 8 · gr (Art. 14 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 KV)

Administrative Court Ruling on Popular Initiative for Ethical Hunting

The main ground for partially allowing the appeal was that Initiativbegehren Ziffern 1 and 4 did not constitute an obvious contradiction with superior law, contrary to the Grand Council's decision.

V 2016 8 · gr (Art. 14 Abs. 2 KV)

Administrative Court Ruling on Popular Initiative for Ethical Hunting

The court found that partial invalidation was permissible because the remaining parts (Ziffer 1 and 4 concerning the Swiss stone pine) formed a sensible whole.

V 2016 8 · gr (Art. 14 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 KV)

Constitutional Challenge to Nature-Compatible Hunting Initiative Provisions

Used to determine the validity of the initiative sections, as the court partially granted the appeal against the Grand Council's declaration of invalidity based on an alleged obvious contradiction with superior law.

V 2015 2 · gr (Art. 14 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 KV)

Constitutional Challenge Against Initiative Limiting Primary School Foreign Languages Upheld

The court found that the initiative satisfied the requirement of unity of form, contrary to the Great Council's presumed finding leading to invalidation.

V 2015 2 · gr (Art. 14 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 KV)

Constitutional Challenge Against Initiative Limiting Primary School Foreign Languages Upheld

The court overturned the prior decision to declare the initiative invalid based on the finding that it was not in obvious contradiction with superior law, which is the core standard for invalidation under this article.

V 2015 2 · gr (Art. 14 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 KV)

Appeal Against Invalidation of Popular Initiative on Compulsory Primary School Foreign Language

The main ground for the final order (Order 1) is the finding that the challenged decision (nullification of the initiative) was contrary to the law because the nullification criteria, specifically the conflict with higher-ranking law, were not met.

V 2015 1 · gr (Art. 14 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 KV)

Popular Initiative Abolishing Special Hunts Invalidated Due to Conflict with Federal Wildlife Management Law

This provision established the ground on which the appeal was dismissed: the initiative was declared invalid due to an evident contradiction with superior law (Art. 14 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 KV), and the court confirmed this reasoning in its final decision (implied in the confirmation of the lower court's decision based on this point, as detailed in E. 15, which relies on the reasoning regarding Art. 14 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 KV in E. 3a/b).

V 2015 1 · gr (Art. 14 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 KV)

Constitutional Challenge to Abolition of Special Hunts Upheld Due to Conflict with Federal Wildlife Law

The main ground for the decision, confirming the lower court's finding that the initiative was declared invalid due to obvious contradiction with overriding law.

V 2015 1 · gr (Art. 14 Abs. 2 KV)

Constitutional Challenge to Abolition of Special Hunts Upheld Due to Conflict with Federal Wildlife Law

Cited in the context of examining the possibility of partial invalidation (Teilungültigkeit).

VB.2015.00374 · zh (Art. 14 KV)

Applicant v. Institution: Right to Education and Admission Eligibility

Cited as the legal basis for the right to education, which was central to the case.

VB.2012.00340 · zh (Art. 14 KV)

Special Education Cost Reimbursement Dispute Based on Procedural Default

Cited in the context of special educational measures and the scope of the cantonal guarantee relative to federal minimum guarantees.