101
BVCstCost
CH
CH
Art. 80 Bundesverfassung der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft (BV) - Tierschutz
BV; 3. Titel: Bund, Kantone und Gemeinden; 2. Kapitel: Zuständigkeiten
Art. 80 BV · Tierschutz
Der Bund erlässt Vorschriften über den Schutz der Tiere.
Er regelt insbesondere: a. die Tierhaltung und die Tierpflege; b. die Tierversuche und die Eingriffe am lebenden Tier; c. die Verwendung von Tieren; d. die Einfuhr von Tieren und tierischen Erzeugnissen; e. den Tierhandel und die Tiertransporte; f. das Töten von Tieren.
Für den Vollzug der Vorschriften sind die Kantone zuständig, soweit das Gesetz ihn nicht dem Bund vorbehält.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (44)
VB.2023.00403 · zh (Art. 80 BV)
Owner loses dog permanently after failing to meet rehoming conditions
Cited in relation to proportionality, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.
VB.2021.00839 · zh (Art. 80 Abs. I BV)
Sheep Shelter Requirement Upheld Against Cantonal Veterinary Order
Cited as one of the constitutional principles relevant to the matter, even if the decision ultimately rested on specific statutes.
VB.2021.00839 · zh (Art. 80 Abs. II BV)
Sheep Shelter Requirement Upheld Against Cantonal Veterinary Order
Cited as one of the constitutional principles relevant to the matter, even if the decision ultimately rested on specific statutes.
VB.2021.00839 · zh (Art. 80 Abs. III BV)
Sheep Shelter Requirement Upheld Against Cantonal Veterinary Order
Cited as one of the constitutional principles relevant to the matter, even if the decision ultimately rested on specific statutes.
VB.2022.00586 · zh (Art. 80 BV)
Definitive Seizure of Dog Upheld Due to Owner's Animal Welfare Violations
This constitutional provision is listed among the legal norms applied.
VD.2019.233 · bs (Art. 80 Abs. 2 BV)
Appeal Regarding Termination of Leisure Garden Lease Due to Animal Welfare Violations
Cited as the constitutional basis for the canton's duty to ensure compliance with animal welfare legislation.
7H 19 155 · lu (Art. 80 Abs. 1 & Abs. 3 BV)
Veterinary Service Ban on Multiple Dogs Upheld Due to Public Safety Risk
Cited regarding the division of legislative competence between the Confederation and the Cantons, relevant for the substance of the ban.
7H 19 141 · lu (Art. 80 BV)
Keeper's Breeding Ban Upheld Based on General Animal Welfare Deficiencies Despite Unsubstantiated Hereditary Disease Claim
Cited as the constitutional basis for the Animal Welfare Act.
VG.2018.1 · bs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 lit. a und b BV)
Primate Rights Initiative Admissibility Challenge
Cited in the reasoning (E. 3.8.1) to establish federal competence in animal welfare matters, analyzed to define the limits of cantonal competence regarding the initiative.
III 2014 181 · sz (Art. 80 Abs. 2 lit. a BV)
Veterinary Order Upheld: Livestock Count Reduced Due to Animal Welfare Violations
Cited as the constitutional basis for the state's duty to protect animal welfare, which underpins the public interest in the measure.
B.2013.161 · sg (Art. 80 Abs. 2 lit. a der Bundesverfassung (BV))
Farmer's Indefinite Animal Keeping Ban Upheld for Repeated Welfare Violations
Cited to establish the constitutional basis for the public interest in ensuring species-appropriate animal husbandry.
B-8533/2010 (Art. 80 BV)
Agricultural Direct Payments for Animal Welfare Violations
This constitutional provision emphasizes the protection of animals.
12.2009.102 · ti (art. 80 Cost.)
Appeal Regarding Bankruptcy Judge's Recusal and Case Reassignment
This article was cited in the reasoning regarding the limits on cantonal legislation concerning the organization of judicial power, informing the decision regarding case reassignment.
11.2007.97 · ti (art. 80 Cost. ticinese)
Spousal Support Modification Appeal Due to Procedural Defect in Jurisdictional Authority
This constitutional provision is cited in the reasoning as insufficient legal basis, but not in the dispositive.
12.2008.221 · ti (art. 80 Cost.)
Judicial Abstention Conflict of Interest and Unconstitutional Delegation in Commercial Registry Matter
Cited in the reasoning regarding the division of judicial power, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1, 2, or 3.