Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
101 BVCstCost CH

Art. 108 Bundesverfassung der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft (BV) - Wohnbau- und Wohneigentumsförderung

BV; 3. Titel: Bund, Kantone und Gemeinden; 2. Kapitel: Zuständigkeiten
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (232 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 108 BV · Wohnbau- und Wohneigentumsförderung

Der Bund fördert den Wohnungsbau, den Erwerb von Wohnungs- und Hauseigentum, das dem Eigenbedarf Privater dient, sowie die Tätigkeit von Trägern und Organisationen des gemeinnützigen Wohnungsbaus.

Er fördert insbesondere die Beschaffung und Erschliessung von Land für den Wohnungsbau, die Rationalisierung und die Verbilligung des Wohnungsbaus sowie die Verbilligung der Wohnkosten.

Er kann Vorschriften erlassen über die Erschliessung von Land für den Wohnungsbau und die Baurationalisierung.

Er berücksichtigt dabei namentlich die Interessen von Familien, Betagten, Bedürftigen und Behinderten.

← Art. 107 BV Bundesverfassung der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft (BV) - Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft Art. 109 BV →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (11)

608 2024 165 · fr (Art. 108 al. 2 Cst.)
Applicant v. Social Security Benefits Office (Recourse for Denial of Justice)
This reference is NOT present in the dispositive. (Exclusion based on rules: Only cite provisions explicitly mentioned in orders I-IV).
SB.2023.00010 · zh (Art. 108 BV)
Tax Appeal: Hardship Deduction for Imputed Income Deemed Unlawful
This provision relates to the prohibition of arbitrary decisions and the principle of proportionality, which the court likely considered in its assessment of the tax measures.
VD.2021.224 · bs (Art. 108 Abs. 1 BV)
Wealth Tax Valuation of Owner-Occupied Property Upheld
Cited regarding the constitutional mandate to promote home ownership, although the court concluded it did not directly bind the cantons in this specific context.
VD.2022.6 · bs (Art. 108 Abs. 1 BV)
Taxpayers Appeal Property Valuation Method for Owner-Occupied Real Estate
The court analyzed and rejected the argument that this constitutional mandate limited cantonal discretion in property valuation for wealth tax.
VD.2022.7 · bs (Art. 108 Abs. 1 BV)
Taxpayers v. Tax Authority: Property Valuation Methods for Owner-Occupied Real Estate
Cited by the appellants in relation to promoting home ownership, but the court ruled it does not directly bind the cantons in property taxation.
B.2018.164 · sg (Art. 108 BV)
Inheritors' Property Gains Tax Discount Dispute
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the constitutional permissibility of fiscal promotion of self-provision through property ownership, which is the underlying principle for the discount provision.
VB.2005.00366 · zh (Art. 108 BV)
Municipality's Appeal Dismissed in Social Assistance Benefits Case
The court uses this article to establish its jurisdiction to review the decision of the district council.
VPB 2001.525 (Art. 108 Cst.)
Swiss Federal Council Proposes New Law on Affordable Housing
This article is cited as the constitutional basis for the Confederation's encouragement of housing construction, acquisition of properties for personal use, and support for non-profit housing developers.
JAAC 65.37 (Art. 108 Abs. 1 BV)
Taxation of Owner-Occupied Homes: Maintenance Deductions vs. Mortgage Interest Relief
This article is referenced to justify the promotion of home ownership, which is the basis for considering the deduction of mortgage interest.
JAAC 65.36 (Art. 108 Abs. 1 BV)
Constitutional Taxation of Owner-Occupied Housing
Cited as the federal mandate to promote home ownership.
VB.2011.00223 · zh (Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a des Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes (VRP, LS 173.1), i.V.m. Art. 34 BV)
Claimant v. Social Assistance Authority on Supplementary Health Insurance Coverage and Procedural Fairness
Used to set aside the decision based on procedural flaws (violation of the right to be heard and insufficient factual investigation).