Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
834.11 CH-BL

§ 1 Verordnung über die Kantonsgarantie zugunsten der Pensionskasse für deren Ausfinanzierungsforderungen gegenüber Arbeitgebenden (Garantieverordnung) - Regelungsbereich

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (10 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

§ 1 Garantieverordnung · Regelungsbereich

1. Diese Verordnung regelt die Garantiezusage des Kantons für die Forderungen der Basellandschaftlichen Pensionskasse (kurz: BLPK) gegenüber denjenigen angeschlossenen Arbeitgebenden, die am 31. Dezember 2014 die auf sie entfallende Forderung der BLPK nicht oder nicht vollständig begleichen.

2. Die Garantiezusage sichert die Forderungen gemäss den Anforderungen von Artikel 58 der Bundesverordnung vom 18. April 1984 über die berufliche Alters-, Hinterlassenen- und Invalidenvorsorge (BVV 2).

Verordnung über die Kantonsgarantie zugunsten der Pensionskasse für deren Ausfinanzierungsforderungen gegenüber Arbeitgebenden (Garantieverordnung) - Regelungsbereich § 2 Garantieverordnung →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (10)

2022.04.21.sv.1 · bl (Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. a EOV)
Appellant Denied Equated Earner Status Due to Failure to Prove Lost Employment and Immediacy Requirements
This provision found no application because the appellant is not to be considered unemployed within the meaning of Art. 10 para. 1 AVIG.
2022.04.21.sv.1 · bl (Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. b EOV)
Appellant Denied Equated Earner Status Due to Failure to Prove Lost Employment and Immediacy Requirements
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to prove that he would have taken up long-term employment if he had not performed his service.
2022.04.21.sv.1 · bl (Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. c EOV)
Appellant Denied Equated Earner Status Due to Failure to Prove Lost Employment and Immediacy Requirements
This provision could not be applied because several months passed between the end of training and the start of civil service, meaning there was no immediacy.
750.18.32.161 · bl (Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. b EOV)
Appellant v. Compensation Authority (Civil Service Earnings Replacement Allowance)
Basis for calculating compensation based on lost earnings when the insured person proves they would have taken up longer-term employment if not for performing civil service.
2017.09.14.sv.2 · bl (Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. c EOV)
Daily Earnings Compensation for Economist After Graduation
This provision, along with Art. 4 Abs. 2 EOV, was cited in the context of individuals who completed their education immediately before starting service, allowing for compensation based on the customary starting salary.
2017.02.07.sv.1 · bl (Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. b EOV)
Lost Earning Potential for Military Service Compensation
This provision is applied to grant the appeal because the plaintiff has credibly demonstrated that he would have taken up long-term employment if he had not had to report for military service.
2017.02.07.sv.1 · bl (Art. 11 Abs. 2 EOG i. V. m. Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. b sowie Art. 4 Abs. 2 EOV)
Lost Earning Potential for Military Service Compensation
The case is remanded to the compensation fund to recalculate the earnings replacement compensation based on these provisions.
750.16.320 · bl (Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. b EOV)
Appellant v. Compensation Fund: Lost Income Calculation
Used to establish that the insured person can claim a higher compensation because they could have taken up longer-term employment if they had not been called up for military service.
750.16.110 · bl (Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. b EOV)
Civil Service Benefit Calculation Based on Pre-Service Income
This provision is not applicable because the court found that the insured person did not credibly demonstrate they would have taken up longer-term employment if they had not entered service.
750.16.110 · bl (Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. c EOV)
Civil Service Benefit Calculation Based on Pre-Service Income
This provision is not applicable because the court found that the presumption of taking up employment after completing education was rebutted.