823.11
CH-BL
CH-BL
§ 1 Verordnung zu den Bundesverordnungen über die Arbeits- und Ruhezeit der berufsmässigen Motorfahrzeugführer und -führerinnen sowie der Führer von leichten Motorwagen zum gewerbsmässigen Personentransport - Gegenstand
§ 1 Verordnung zu den Bundesverordnungen über die Arbeits- und Ruhezeit der berufsmässigen Motorfahrzeugführer und -führerinnen sowie der Führer von leichten Motorwagen zum gewerbsmässigen Personentransport · Gegenstand
1. Diese Verordnung regelt den Vollzug der Bundesverordnung vom 19. Juni 1995 über die Arbeits- und Ruhezeit der berufsmässigen Motorfahrzeugführer und -führerinnen (Chauffeurverordnung, ARV 1) und der Bundesverordnung vom 6. Mai 1981 über die Arbeits- und Ruhezeit der Führer und Führerinnen von leichten Motorwagen zum gewerbsmässigen Personentransport (ARV 2).
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (7)
A/3701/2022 · ge (art. 1 LSE)
Delivery Company Personnel Leasing Classification Upheld
The court used this article to define the scope of the law (LSE), specifically concerning placement and temporary work, which is the core subject of the appeal regarding the appellant's activity being subject to authorization.
A1 17 107 · vs (Art. T1-1 LC)
Hotel Permit Cancellation Upheld Due to Floor Area Miscalculation and Missing Minergie Certification
This transitional provision was cited regarding the application of the new Construction Law in the context of ongoing appeal procedures.
ADM 2016 80 · ju (art. 1 let. c LSE)
Personnel Placement Company Restrictions Upheld Due to Familial Conflict of Interest Concerns
Cited to establish the purpose of the LSE, which includes protecting workers using private placement, public employment services, or temporary employment services.
V 11 227 1 · lu (Art. 1 lit. c AVG)
Care Company's Services Deemed Regulated Temporary Work
Cited in the final considerations to justify applying the authorization requirement to protect employees.
V 11 227 2 · lu (Art. 1 lit. c AVG)
Personnel Leasing Status of In-Home Care Provider Upheld
Cited in the context of the purpose of the federal regulation, which is the protection of employees who are 'hired' and then assigned, supporting the need to apply the permit requirement.
A1 07 83 · vs (art. 1 al. 2, 15 al. 2 et 17 LC)
Property Owner v. Municipality (Aesthetic Grounds for Pavilion Denial)
These articles are cited as the sufficient legal grounds, alongside aesthetic and building order concerns, to reject the conclusion for the issuance of the authorization.
GE.2000.0066 · vd (art. 1 let. a LSE)
Applicant v. Employment Service (Private Placement Authorization)
The reasoning cites Art. 1 letter a LSE to establish the federal law's scope regarding private placement.