842.11
EGKUMVLILAMAMKUMV
CH-BE
CH-BE
Art. 46 Gesetz betreffend die Einführung der Bundesgesetze über die Kranken-, die Unfall- und die Militärversicherung (EG KUMV) - Klageverfahren
Schiedsgericht in Sozialversicherungsstreitigkeiten - Verfahren
Art. 46 Gesetz betreffend die Einführung der Bundesgesetze über die Kranken-, die Unfall- und die Militärversicherung (EG KUMV) · Klageverfahren
1. Die oder der neutrale Vorsitzende des Schiedsgerichts leitet das Klageverfahren.
2. Soweit dieses Gesetz keine abweichenden Regelungen enthält, richtet sich das Klageverfahren nach den Bestimmungen des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRPG [10]).
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (84)
200 2022 209 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV)
Medical Professional Denied Deadline Restoration for Defence in Insurers' Recovery Claim
Cited in conjunction with VRPG/VKD articles for allocating procedural costs and party costs to the losing party (Gesuchsteller).
200 2014 903 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV)
Service Provider Tariff Dispute for Ambulatory Nursing Care Services
Cited in order 3 to confirm the allocation of court costs based on who wins/loses, drawing upon Art. 109 Abs. 1 VRPG.
200 2014 903 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV)
Service Provider Tariff Dispute for Ambulatory Nursing Care Services
Used in order 3 regarding the allocation of procedural costs and in order 4 regarding the allocation of party costs.
200 2024 453 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV)
Service Provider v. Insurer: Validity of Health Insurance Fee Schedule Reduction
Cited in conjunction with VRPG provisions to allocate procedural costs to the claimant and concerning the scope of the court's review power.
200 2023 787 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV i.V.m. Art. 109 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Claimant v. Respondent: Excessive Billing and Statistical Method Validity in Health Insurance Fee Dispute
Applied to determine that the party costs are to be allocated to the parties according to their success/failure in the proceedings.
200 2023 787 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV i.V.m. Art. 109 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Claimant v. Respondent: Excessive Billing and Statistical Method Validity in Health Insurance Fee Dispute
Applied to determine that the procedural costs are to be imposed on the losing party (Klägerin/Widerbeklagte).
200 2024 524 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV)
Health Insurers v. Healthcare Provider (Repayment of Unduly Claimed Urgency Fees)
Cited in conjunction with Art. 109 Abs. 1 VRPG for the allocation of procedural costs for the main claim procedure.
200 2022 67 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV)
Tarifsuisse AG v. B.________ AG: Reimbursement of Improperly Billed Urgency Inconvenience Fees
Cited (sometimes in conjunction with other articles) to regulate procedural aspects, including the basis for awarding party costs and procedure for the main claim.
200 2020 389 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV i.V.m. Art. 109 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Insurer Reimbursement Claim Against Doctor Billed After License Revocation
These provisions governed the allocation and proportioning of court costs between the parties based on their degree of success.
200 2019 549 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV)
Insurers v. Physician: Repayment of Unjustified Fees (2017)
Cited in the dispositive section 2 and 4, in connection with VRPG, concerning the allocation of costs based on the extent of success.
200 2020 549 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV)
Health Insurers v. General Internal Medicine Specialist Regarding Economic Efficiency Violation (2018 Costs)
Cited in connection with Article 32 Abs. 2 and 3 VRPG regarding the formal requirements of the complaint and in connection with Article 109 Abs. 1 VRPG for imposing procedural costs.
200 2021 518 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV)
Insurer Suit Against Medical Specialist Over Excessive 2019 Direct Costs
Cited in conjunction with VRPG provisions concerning the formality of the claim (E. 1.4) and procedural rules for the arbitration court (E. 1.3).
200 2021 518 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV i.V.m. Art. 109 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Insurer Suit Against Medical Specialist Over Excessive 2019 Direct Costs
Cited for the imposition of court costs on the defendant.
200 2022 406 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV)
Health Insurers v. General Practitioner Overbilling
Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for applying the cantonal rules regarding the allocation of procedural costs (Art. 109 Abs. 1 VRPG).
200 2021 743 · be (Art. 46 Abs. 2 EG KUMV i.V.m. Art. 109 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Insurers v. Doctor: Recovery of Unjust Fees Based on Recalibrated Economic Efficiency Comparison
This combination of articles was applied in the dispositive (Order 2) to determine the allocation of litigation costs based on the outcome.