721.0
BAUGLC
CH-BE
CH-BE
Art. 36 Baugesetz (BauG) - Bauentscheid 1 Anwendbares Recht
Öffentliches Baurecht - Baubewilligungsverfahren
Art. 36 Baugesetz (BauG) · Bauentscheid 1 Anwendbares Recht
Soweit das Bundesrecht nichts anderes bestimmt, sind Bauvorhaben nach dem zur Zeit der Einreichung des Baugesuchs geltenden Recht zu beurteilen.
Der Entscheid ist jedoch zurückzustellen und es ist nach Artikel 62a Absatz 3 vorzugehen, wenn das Bauvorhaben Nutzungsplänen (Art. 57 Abs. 2) widerspricht, die bei der Gesuchseinreichung öffentlich aufgelegen haben.
Baugesuche, die im Hinblick auf vorgesehene neue Vorschriften oder Pläne eingereicht werden, sind nach deren Genehmigung aufgrund dieser Vorschriften oder Pläne zu beurteilen, sofern die Baubewilligung nicht vorzeitig erteilt werden kann (Art. 37).
Die Bestimmungen über die Planungszone (Art. 62 f.) bleiben vorbehalten.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (13)
110 2021 40 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 BauG)
Appeal Against Building Permit for Mobile Communication Mast Due to Radiation and Scenery Concerns
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the principle that building applications must be assessed according to the law in force at the time of submission.
110 2022 142 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 BauG)
Municipal Decision on Unauthorized Attic Additions Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the applicable law for assessing building projects (law at the time of the application filing).
110 2022 142 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 2 BauG)
Municipal Decision on Unauthorized Attic Additions Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the deferral of a decision if the project contradicts zoning plans that were publicly displayed at the time of the application submission.
110 2021 104 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 BauG)
Building Permit Suspension Overturned Due to Missed Statutory Deadline
The appeal was granted and the decision to suspend the building permit process was overturned, requiring the process to continue under the law applicable at the time the application was filed.
110 2021 91 · be (Art. 36 BauG)
Petitioners v. City Authority Regarding Carport Permit Denial Based on Aesthetic Regulations
Cited to explain that the administrative authority is not required to propose viable alternatives if the initial application does not meet legal requirements.
120 2021 28 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 BauG)
Facade Renovation Legality and Restoration Order in Preservation Zone
Cited regarding the principle that construction projects are judged based on the law applicable at the time of application, though its implications were superseded by other rules.
110 2021 10 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 BauG)
Land Use Directorate Overturns Permit Suspension Due to Improper Procedure
It is cited in the reasoning regarding the applicable law for judging the building application, which forms the basis for the main order to overturn the stay.
110 2020 13 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 3 BauG)
Building Permit Denial Upheld Pending Zoning Revision
Used as the legal basis for discussing the requested suspension of the building permit procedure based on future planning law.
110 2019 24 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 BauG)
Appeal Against Cellular Base Station Permit Based on Radiation and Visual Impact
Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle that the planned development must be assessed according to the law applicable at the time of submission.
110 2017 31 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 3 BauG)
Administrative Appeal Overturns Building Permit Lacking Final Development Plan Approval
This provision determined the standard for assessing the building application in light of the pending new regulations.
110 2016 157 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 und 2 BauG)
Appeal Against Suspension of Mobile Radio Antenna Permit Based on Erroneous Application of Building Regulation Article 15
Cited in the reasoning regarding the temporal applicability of planning law to building projects.
110 2016 159 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 und 2 BauG)
Applicant v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit Suspension for Antenna Replacement
Cited in the reasoning concerning which law is applicable when a building application is filed in relation to current usage plans.
110 2015 177 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 BauG)
Solar Collector Permit Rejection Upheld Due to Aesthetic Noncompliance
Cited in reasoning to establish that the building regulations in force at the time of the building application must be used for assessment.