161.1
GSOGLOJM
CH-BE
CH-BE
Art. 77 Gesetz über die Organisation der Gerichtsbehörden und der Staatsanwaltschaft (GSOG) - Spruchkörper
Kantonal zuständige Gerichtsbehörden - Enteignungsschätzungskommission
Art. 77 Gesetz über die Organisation der Gerichtsbehörden und der Staatsanwaltschaft (GSOG) · Spruchkörper
1. Der Spruchkörper setzt sich zusammen aus einer oder einem Vorsitzenden sowie zwei Fachrichterinnen oder Fachrichtern. Den Vorsitz führt die Präsidentin, der Präsident, die Vizepräsidentin oder der Vizepräsident.
1a Die Enteignungsschätzungskommission urteilt in Dreierbesetzung. Die Präsidentin, der Präsident, die Vizepräsidentin oder der Vizepräsident entscheidet als Einzelrichterin oder als Einzelrichter, wenn ein Gesuch, eine Klage oder eine Beschwerde zurückgezogen oder gegenstandslos wird oder nicht darauf eingetreten werden kann.
2. Bei der Zusammensetzung des Spruchkörpers ist den regionalen Interessen angemessen Rechnung zu tragen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (13)
VVGE.2003.04.Nr.4 · ow (Art. 77 Abs. 1 BPR)
Public Utility's Referendum Flyer Campaign Violates Restraint Principle
Cited as the legal basis for the Regierungsrat's responsibility to examine irregularities in federal votes and to issue orders.
VPB 150000263 (Art. 77 Abs. 1 Bst. b BPR)
Federal Council Confirms Vote Results, Rejects Reconsideration Requests
Cited as the basis for bringing an appeal concerning irregularities in a vote.
VPB 150000263 (Art. 77 Abs. 2 BPR)
Federal Council Confirms Vote Results, Rejects Reconsideration Requests
Cited regarding the deadline for lodging an appeal in electoral matters.
VPB 87-067 (Art. 77 al. 1 let. c BPR)
National Council Election Validation Case
Cited in relation to appeals against cantonal government decisions regarding elections.
VVGE.2009.10.Nr.4 · ow (Art. 77 BPR)
Dismissal of Referendum Challenge Due to Lack of Specific Irregularities
Cited as the legal basis for the right to appeal concerning irregularities in votes.
1C_33/2010 (Art. 77 al. 1 let. b LDP)
Federal vote on minarets initiative: appeal against results time-barred under LDP three-day deadline for post-vote irregularities.
Main ground for inadmissibility: the appeal should have been filed with the cantonal government, not directly with the Federal Supreme Court.
1C_33/2010 (Art. 77 al. 2 LDP)
Federal vote on minarets initiative: appeal against results time-barred under LDP three-day deadline for post-vote irregularities.
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive: the appeal was time-barred because the deadline for filing was not respected.
JAAC 68.64 (Art. 77 Abs. 1 Bst. a, Art. 80 Abs. 1 BPR)
Electoral Freedom vs. Register Truthfulness: Transsexual Candidate's Ballot Name Dispute
Cited to establish that a complaint regarding register keeping is a voting rights complaint, not an election complaint, and that the jurisdiction lies with the cantonal government first, not the Federal Court.
VPB 2001.2521 (Art. 77, al. 2, LDP)
Political Party Registration, Electronic Voting, and Electoral Reform Act
Prevents the use of the right of appeal for dilatory purposes.
VPB du-11-ao-t-1999 (art. 77, al. 2, LDP)
Federal Council Circular on 1999 Constitutional Vote Irregularities and Validation
Cited to indicate that the publication of provisional results marks the beginning of the full appeal period.
JAAC 60.70 (Art. 77 Abs. 2 BPR)
Complainant's Election Challenge Dismissed for Untimeliness
Establishes a three-day period to appeal against decisions regarding the incorrect consideration of submitted candidacies.
RRE Nr 2483 · lu (Art. 77 Abs. 1 lit. b BPR)
Cantonal Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Federal Explanatory Text Challenge
This provision is cited to explain the scope of the appeal mechanism, which is limited to acts by cantonal authorities, leading to the conclusion that the appeal cannot be heard.
AGVE.2015.84 · ag (Art. 77 Abs. 1 lit. b BPR)
Referendum Outcome Not Affected by Minor Vote Counting Errors
Cited as the basis for the type of appeal being reviewed (abstimmungsbeschwerde).