Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
143.1 VRPG CH-AR

Art. 54 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRPG) - Zulässigkeit

3. Abschnitt: Die Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit - III. Die Verwaltungsgerichtsbeschwerde
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (58 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 54 VRPG · Zulässigkeit

1. Die Beschwerde an das Obergericht ist zulässig gegen

a) letztinstanzliche Endverfügungen der Verwaltungsbehörden;

b) letztinstanzliche Zwischenverfügungen der Verwaltungsbehörden, wenn sie für die Betroffenen einen Nachteil zur Folge haben, der sich später voraussichtlich nicht mehr beheben lässt;

c) das unrechtmässige Verweigern oder Verzögern einer anfechtbaren Verfügung durch eine letztinstanzliche Verwaltungsbehörde.

2. Sie ist unzulässig, wenn eine Verfügung unmittelbar bei einer Verwaltungsbehörde des Bundes, beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht oder beim Bundesstrafgericht angefochten werden kann oder wenn das Gesetz eine Verfügung ausdrücklich als endgültig bezeichnet.

3. Das Gesetz kann dem Obergericht weitere Streitigkeiten zuweisen oder den Weiterzug an das Obergericht ausschliessen.

← Art. 53 VRPG Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRPG) - Geltungsbereich Art. 55 VRPG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (41)

OG O4V 22 25 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 VRPG)
License Withdrawal Upheld After Evading Sobriety Test Following Hit-and-Run
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's substantive jurisdiction to hear the appeal against the final administrative decision.
OG O4V 22 23 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Property Owner's Appeal Against Cantonal Road Expropriation Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
OG O4V 21 36 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Appeal of Building Permit Denial for Access Road in Agricultural Zone
This article was cited in the reasoning regarding the court's general jurisdiction to handle appeals against final administrative decisions.
OG O4V 21 6 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Residence Permit Revocation Following Short-Term Marriage Without Proof of Hardship
Cited to establish the functional jurisdiction of the High Court to hear appeals against final administrative decisions.
OG O2V 21 20 · ar (Art. 54 VRPG)
Social Security Damages Liability Reversed Based on Defense of Necessity in Corporate Insolvency
Cited in the reasoning section to confirm compliance with procedural requirements for admissibility (though not repeated in the dispositive).
OG O4V 21 14 · ar (Art. 54 VRPG)
Popular Initiative Against Mobile Antennas vs. Federal Radiation Law
Cited in conjunction with Art. 65bis Abs. 2 GPR as the legal basis for the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
OG O4V 20 36 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Family Refugee Early Settlement Permit Appeal Over Social Assistance Debt
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's competence to hear the appeal against the final administrative decision.
OG O4V 20 39 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Municipality Liability for Social Assistance Based on Established Support Residence
Cited to establish the court's competence to hear the appeal against the lower court's decision.
OG O4V 20 19 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Property Owner Appeal of Municipal Rezoning Zone Inadmissible
Used by the court to establish its general jurisdiction to hear appeals against final administrative decisions.
OG O4V 20 23 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 lit. b VRPG)
Appeal Dismissed Due to Interlocutory Decision Lack of Irreparable Harm
Cited as the procedural prerequisite that was not met, leading to the non-admission of the appeal.
OG O4V 20 25 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 lit. b VRPG)
Municipality Appeal Dismissed Against Intermediate Departmental Decision on Road Construction Reassessment
The court did not enter a judgment on the appeal because the requirements for admissibility, specifically the existence of an irremediable disadvantage according to this article, were not met.
OG O4V 20 9 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Departmental Decision on Retroactive Building Permit and Restoration Order Upheld Due to Procedural Deficiencies and Planning Law Violations
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1) to establish the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
OG O4V 20 10 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Building Permit Revocation Due to Insufficient Easement Access
Used implicitly to confirm the court's competence to hear the appeal, although not explicitly in the final operative part, it is mentioned in the reasoning leading to the judgment.
OG O3V 19 46 · ar (Art. 54 VRPG)
Appeal Regarding Refusal of Disability Benefits Due to Evolving Medical Conditions
Cited in the reasoning when confirming that procedural prerequisites for entering the appeal were met.
OG O4V 20 5 · ar (Art. 54 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Social Assistance Appeal Mootness Due to Subsequent Agency Decision
Cited as the basis for the court's functional jurisdiction to hear appeals against final decisions of administrative authorities.