Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
155.21 VRPGLPJALGA CH-BE

Art. 61 Legge sulla Procedura Amministrativa (LPAm) - Provvedimenti Interlocutori

Procedura di ricorso interna all'amministrazione - Oggetto del ricorso
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (140 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 61 Legge sulla Procedura Amministrativa (LPAm) · Provvedimenti Interlocutori

**1. Le disposizioni intermedie sono considerate tali quando non concludono il procedimento né integralmente né parzialmente, in particolare riguardo a**

a) la competenza,

b) la ricusazione e il rifiuto,

c) la sospensione del procedimento,

d) l'obbligo di informazione, testimonianza o edizione dei documenti e l'esclusione di una parte dall'escussione testimoniale,

e) il rifiuto dell'accesso ai documenti,

f) il mancato assunzione delle prove minacciate,

g) le misure cautelari e le disposizioni relative all'effetto sospensivo.

**2. Le disposizioni intermedie sulla competenza e sulla ricusazione e il rifiuto sono autonomamente impugnabili. Esse non possono più essere impugnate successivamente.**

**3. Altre disposizioni intermedie sono autonomamente impugnabili se**

a) possono causare un danno irreparabile o

b) l'accoglimento del ricorso comporterebbe immediatamente una decisione finale, risparmiando così un notevole dispendio di tempo o costi per un procedimento probatorio complesso.

**4. Se il ricorso ai sensi del comma 3 non è ammissibile o non è stato utilizzato, la disposizione intermedia può essere impugnata tramite ricorso contro la decisione finale, nella misura in cui influisca sul suo contenuto.**

**5. Le disposizioni impugnabili devono essere corredate di un'istruzione sui mezzi di impugnazione.**

← Art. 60 Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (VRPG) - Principio 1. Fondamenti - Ambito di Applicazione Art. 62 Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPRA) - Direzione →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (153)

200 2024 714 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 3 lit. b VRPG)
Municipality v. Social Assistance Recipients Repayment Terms Appeal
Used to qualify the lower authority's decision as an appealable interim decision because allowing the appeal would immediately lead to a final decision, saving considerable effort.
200 2024 714 · be (Art. 74 Abs. 3 i.V.m. Art. 61 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Municipality v. Social Assistance Recipients Repayment Terms Appeal
Used to qualify the lower authority's decision as an interim decision.
100 2019 115 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Bernese Real Estate Tax Exemption Dispute Regarding Main Residence Requirements and Deferral Periods
Cited in the reasoning (E. 5.1) to classify the deferral ruling as an interlocutory decision.
100 2019 115 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 4 VRPG)
Bernese Real Estate Tax Exemption Dispute Regarding Main Residence Requirements and Deferral Periods
Cited in the reasoning (E. 5.2, 5.3) to establish that the interlocutory decision on the deferral period was appealable alongside the final decision.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.3) to define the nature of the decision as an interlocutory decision. Not in the dispositive.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 2 VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in the reasoning (E. 2.1, E. 2.5) regarding exceptions to the appealability of interlocutory decisions. Not in the dispositive.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 3 Bst. a VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in the reasoning (E. 2.6) regarding the conditions for appealing an interlocutory decision based on irremediable prejudice. Not in the dispositive.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in the reasoning (E. 2.1, E. 2.5) regarding the conditions for appealing interlocutory decisions. Not in the dispositive.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 4 VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in reasoning (E. 2.3, E. 2.5) regarding the condition that an interlocutory decision affects the final ruling. Not in the dispositive.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 74 Abs. 3 i.V.m. Art. 61 Abs. 4 VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in reasoning (E. 2.3) regarding the effect of the final decision on the interlocutory cost ruling. Not in the dispositive.
100 2025 263 · be (Art. 74 Abs. 3 i.V.m. Art. 61 Abs. 3 Bst. a VRPG)
Appeal of Administrative Deadline Extension in Exam Review
This provision was discussed in the reasoning regarding the self-standing appealability of interlocutory decisions, though the court ultimately avoided a definitive ruling on its application to this case.
200 2024 419 · be (art. 61 let. fbis LPJA a contrario)
Worker's Appeal of Denied Impairment Indemnity Upheld Due to Insufficient Medical Evidence
Applied in order 2 to confirm that no procedural fees are to be collected because the procedure is free.
110 2025 24 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 1 Bst. a und Abs. 2 VRPG)
Building Permit Jurisdiction Dispute Over Hotel Terrace Modification
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the admissibility of the appeal against an interlocutory decision on jurisdiction.
100 2025 81 · be (Art. 74 Abs. 3 i.V.m. Art. 61 Abs. 1 Bst. b und Abs. 2 VRPG)
Municipality Appeal Regarding Official Disqualification for Building Permit Suggestion
Used to establish the court's jurisdiction as the final cantonal instance.
100 2024 322 · be (Art. 74 Abs. 3 i.V.m. Art. 61 VRPG)
Tax Appeals Commission Rulings on Intermediate Tax Assessment Clarification Not Immediately Appealable
This provision governs the conditions under which appeals against interlocutory decisions (which the court deemed the challenged decisions to be) are admissible.