Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep I R 139/2008 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2008:I.R.139.2008 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court rejects request for change of court based solely on dissatisfaction with other cases.

Numero d'incarto Sklep I R 139/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the plaintiff's motion to transfer the case to a different court. The plaintiff argued that the Piran Court was biased because it had handled other cases involving the plaintiff, but offered no evidence of procedural inefficiency. The court ruled that mere dissatisfaction with prior rulings does not constitute a significant reason under the law to change the assigned court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure; A party's dissatisfaction with a court's decisions in other matters does not constitute a significant reason for transferring the case when no procedural inefficiency is demonstrated.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
change of court significant reason procedural inefficiency dissatisfaction with rulings civil procedure law court jurisdiction bias allegation diffida dell'istituzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure
Generato dall'IA
Sklep I Pr 7/93
Court allows transfer of civil case jurisdiction due to criminal proceedings against the plaintiff involving same court judges.
VSRS Sklep I R 48/2019
Supreme Court orders transfer of case to ensure objective impartiality when judge is spouse of opposing party.
VSRS sklep I R 146/2015
Supreme Court transfers case to Maribor court due to plaintiff's employment at defendant court ensuring impartiality.
Sklep I R 19/98
Supreme Court delegates jurisdiction to another district court due to kinship between plaintiff and judge under ZPP Art. 68.
VSRS Sklep I R 209/2023
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses jurisdiction transfer request based solely on dissatisfaction with local court performance.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Tožnik svojega predloga ni argumentiral s trditvami o neekonomičnosti postopka pri piranskem sodišču, tožnikovo nezadovoljstvo z odločitvami sodišča v drugih zadevah pa tudi ne predstavlja tehtnega razloga v skladu z navedeno določbo zakona.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožnik je na naroku za glavno obravnavo dne 28.10.2008 predlagal, "da se dodeli drugo stvarno sodišče za odločanje v tem postopku, ker bo le nepristransko sodišče lahko odločilo po zakonu". Iz sodnega zapisnika o navedenem naroku je razvidno, da je tožnik nezadovoljen s sojenjem piranskega sodišča v drugih sodnih zadevah.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

2. Vrhovno sodišče lahko na predlog stranke določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi (67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku). Tožnik svojega predloga ni argumentiral s trditvami o neekonomičnosti postopka pri piranskem sodišču, tožnikovo nezadovoljstvo z odločitvami sodišča v drugih zadevah pa tudi ne predstavlja tehtnega razloga v skladu z navedeno določbo zakona.