Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep I R 19/2001 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2001:I.R.19.2001 Generato dall'IA

Court dismisses case and transfers jurisdiction to Celje because plaintiff is court clerk at Žalec court.

Numero d'incarto Sklep I R 19/2001
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the case and designated the District Court in Celje as the competent court for trial. The plaintiff, a court clerk employed at the District Court in Žalec, sued for a debt of 265,265.00 SIT, prompting the Žalec court to request a transfer of jurisdiction. The court ruled that the plaintiff's employment at the original court constituted a significant reason under the Civil Procedure Act to designate a different competent court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act; The court may designate a different competent court when the plaintiff is an employee of the original court, as this constitutes a significant reason for jurisdictional transfer.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Civil Procedure Act jurisdiction transfer court clerk employment significant reason competent court designation employee of court procedural transfer collocamento in posizione provvisoria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act (1999)
Generato dall'IA
Sklep I R 54/2004
Slovenian Supreme Court allows transfer of jurisdiction due to employee at local court raising impartiality doubts.
Sklep I R 138/2002
Supreme Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction due to judge's employment location in another district court.
Sklep I R 3/2002
Supreme Court transfers case to another court due to plaintiff's employment at the original court.
Sklep I R 96/2007
Supreme Court allows transfer of case to another court to ensure appearance of impartiality when defendant works there.
Sklep I R 25/2009
Supreme Court transfers case to another district court due to judge's father being the defendant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Za sojenje v tej zadevi se določi Okrajno sodišče v Celju.

[JEDRO]

Pravdna stranka je sodna zapisnikarica na pristojnem sodišču.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožeča stranka je proti toženi stranki vložila pri Okrajnem sodišču v Žalcu tožbo zaradi plačila zneska 265.265,00 SIT.

Okrajno sodišče v Žalcu je dne 23.3.2001 podalo predlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča, ker je tožeča stranka sodna zapisnikarica pri omenjenem sodišču.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po določbi 67. člena ZPP (Zakona o pravdnem postopku - 1999) lahko vrhovno sodišče na predlog pristojnega sodišča določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če za to obstoje tehtni razlogi. V predlogu navedena okoliščina, da je tožnica sodna zapisnikarica pri stvarno in krajevno pristojnem sodišču je tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča. Zato je odločeno, kot izhaja iz izreka sklepa.