Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep I R 14/2001 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2001:I.R.14.2001 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court transfers civil case to another court due to judge plaintiff's daily contact with original court judges.

Numero d'incarto Sklep I R 14/2001
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia transferred a civil case from the original court to the Court in Celje upon the presiding judge's request. The plaintiff, who is a judge at the original court, argued that his daily interactions with the local judges created a reasonable doubt about the court's impartiality. The Supreme Court agreed, ruling that such circumstances constitute a valid ground for transferring jurisdiction under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 67 of the Code of Civil Procedure; The Supreme Court may transfer a case to another competent court upon request if there are weighty reasons, such as the plaintiff being a judge at the original court who has daily contact with its judges, thereby creating a reasonable doubt about impartiality.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Code of Civil Procedure transfer of jurisdiction judge as plaintiff impartiality doubt reasonable doubt weighty reasons procedural transfer rispetto del procedimento precontenzioso

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 67 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Generato dall'IA
Sklep I R 66/2002
Supreme Court transfers case to Celje Court due to employee's employment at Žalec Court raising impartiality doubts.
Sklep I R 29/95
Supreme Court delegates case to Radovljica District Court for procedural efficiency under ZPP Art. 68.
VSRS Sklep I R 148/2021
Supreme Court transfers civil case jurisdiction to Domžale due to defendant's relationship with Ljubljane judge.
VSRS Sklep I R 10/2025
Court rejects jurisdiction delegation request based on clerical staff's role and lack of close ties to judges.
Sklep I R 39/2005
Supreme Court transfers case to another court due to employee's employment at the original court causing perceived bias.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi Okrajno sodišče v Celju.

[JEDRO]

Dejstvo, da je tožnik sodnik in da je v vsakodnevnih stikih s sodniki Okrajnega sodišča v ..., je za postopek moteča okoliščina, ki bi utegnila vzbuditi dvom o nepristranskosti sodišča.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Pri Okrajnem sodišču v ... teče pod opr. št. P 313/2001 pravdni postopek tožnika P. P. proti toženki J. P. Predsednica Okrajnega sodišča v ... predlaga, da Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi 67. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku določi krajevno pristojnost drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča, ker je tožnik sodnik Okrožnega sodišča v ... Sodniki obeh sodišč so v vsakodnevnih stikih. To bi pri toženki in v javnosti utegnilo vzbuditi dvom v nepristranost sodišča.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po 67. členu Zakona o pravdnem postopku lahko vrhovno sodišče na predlog pristojnega sodišča določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če so za to dani tehtni razlogi. Dejstvo, da je tožnik sodnik in da je v vsakodnevnih stikih s sodniki Okrajnega sodišča v ..., je za postopek moteča okoliščina, ki bi utegnila vzbuditi dvom o nepristranskosti sodišča. Da se tak dvom odpravi, je Vrhovno sodišče predlogu ugodilo in določilo Okrajno sodišče v Celje, kot bližnje sodišče, da izpelje postopek v tej zadevi.